ArticleJAMA network open2022
Association of Social Risk Domains With Poor Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control in US Adults With Diabetes, From 2006 to 2016.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neighborhood Safety and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Pooled it
- Newer Pharmacologic Treatments in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Clinical Guideline From the American College of Physicians.Annals of internal medicine · 2024Guideline
- Sex differences in the association between cumulative social risk and life's essential 8 cardiovascular health scores in U.S. adults.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Social Risk Factors and Disparities in Advanced Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Differential Effects of Social Determinants of Health Factors on Mortality in US Adults with Prediabetes: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2018.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting White Matter Hyperintensity: Leveraging Portable MRI for Accessible Brain Health Screening.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Factors associated with HIV Testing within the National Health Interview Survey (2006-2018).Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Article
- Association Between Historical Neighborhood Redlining and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among US Veterans With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases.JAMA network open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Few studies have examined the association between social risk factors and poor control of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Objective: To examine the sequential association between social risk domains and CVD risk control over time in older adults with diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed core interviews from 4877 US adults with diabetes who were participating in the Health and Retirement Study, a national longitudinal survey of US adults. Participants were older than 50 years, completed the social risk domain questions, and had data on CVD risk factor measures from January 2006 to December 2016. Data were analyzed from June to July 2022. Exposures: Five social risk domains were created: (1) economic stability, (2) neighborhood or built environment, (3) education access, (4) health care access, and (5) social or community context. Main Outcomes and Measures: The 4 primary outcomes were (1) poor glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] level ≥8.0%), (2) poor blood pressure (BP) control (systolic BP≥140 mm Hg and diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg), (3) poor cholesterol control (total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio ≥5), and (4) a composite of poor CVD risk control (≥2 poorly controlled glucose level, BP, or cholesterol level). Results: Among this cohort of 4877 older adults with diabetes (mean [SD] age, 68.6 [9.8] years; 2715 women [55.7%]), 890 participants (18.3%) had an HbA1c level of 8% or higher, 774 (15.9%) had systolic BP of 140 mm Hg or higher and diastolic BP of 90 mm Hg or higher, 962 (19.7%) had total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio of 5 or higher, and 437 (9.0%) had at least 2 poorly controlled CVD risk factors. Neighborhood or built environment (ie, adverse social support) was independently associated with poor glycemic control (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.06-1.63), whereas economic stability (ie, medication cost-related nonadherence) (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-1.87) and health care access (ie, lack of health insurance) (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.20-2.09) were independently associated with poor BP control after full adjustment. Education access (ie, lack of education) (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01-1.52) and health care access (ie, lack of health insurance) (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.68) were independently associated with poor cholesterol control. Health care access (ie, lack of health insurance) was the only social risk domain that was independently associated with having at least 2 poorly controlled CVD risk factors (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.26-2.37). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that certain social risk domains are associated with control of CVD risk factors over time. Interventions targeting domains, such as neighborhood or built environment, economic stability, and education access, may be beneficial to controlling CVD risk factors in older adults with diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.