ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
Approach to glaucoma diagnosis and prediction based on multiparameter neural network.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in glaucoma: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the effect of comprehensive factor analysis on the relationship between glaucoma assessment and combined parameters including trans-laminar cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) and fractional pressure reserve (FPR).
methodsThe clinical data of 1029 patients with 15 indicators from the medical records of Beijing Tongren Hospital and 600 cases with 1322 indicators from Beijing Eye Research were collected. The doc2vec method was used to vectorize. The multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICE) method was used to interpolate. The original data combined with TLCPD, combined with FPR, and not combined parameters were respectively applied to train the neural network based on VGG16 and autoencoder to predict glaucoma and to evaluate the effect of combined parameters.
resultsThe accuracy rates used to classify the glaucoma of the two sets reach over 0.90, and the precision rates reach 0.70 and 0.80 respectively. After using TLCPD and FPR for the autoencoder method, the accuracy rates are both close to 1.0, and the precision rates are 0.90 and 0.70 respectively.
conclusionUsing the combined parameters of FPR and TLCPD can effectively improve the diagnosis and prediction of glaucoma. Compared with TLCPD, FPR is more suitable for improving the effect of neural network for glaucoma classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36083563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.