Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36083483›Full record

ArticleJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2022

Efficacy of Qiancao () and Haipiaoxiao (), a traditional Chinese herb pair, on abnormal uterine bleeding in rats with incomplete abortion.

Zhang Tiantian, L I Guowen, Chu Zhifeng, L I Jie, Y U Lijun, Gao Yuan, Wang Huifeng

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhang TiantianDepartment of Pharmacy, Shanghai Songjiang Fangta Hospital of TCM, Shanghai 201600, China.
L I GuowenDepartment of Pharmacy, Shanghai TCM-Integrated Hospital, Shanghai 200080, China.
Chu ZhifengDepartment of Pharmacy, Shanghai Songjiang Fangta Hospital of TCM, Shanghai 201600, China.
L I JieDepartment of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai Songjiang Fangta Hospital of TCM, Shanghai 201600, China.
Y U LijunDepartment of Pharmacy, Shanghai Songjiang Fangta Hospital of TCM, Shanghai 201600, China.
Gao YuanDepartment of Pharmacy, Shanghai Songjiang Fangta Hospital of TCM, Shanghai 201600, China.
Wang HuifengDepartment of Pharmacy, Shanghai Songjiang Fangta Hospital of TCM, Shanghai 201600, China.
Songjiang District Central Hospital · CNIntegrated Chinese Medicine (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the most effective weight ratio of Qiancao () and Haipiaoxiao () used to produce decoction for the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in rats with incomplete abortion, and to study the possible mechanism.

methodsThe models of AUB were established by incomplete drug abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in pregnant rats. The therapeutic effects of decoctions made by eight different weight ratios of Qiancao () and Haipiaoxiao () were observed.

resultsStatistical analysis revealed that the most effective weight ratio of Qiancao () and Haipiaoxiao () to treat AUB in this study was 2∶1.

conclusionThe insights gained from this study would improve understanding of the mechanisms involved in the effect of Qiancao () and Haipiaoxiao () on AUB.

Indexed as

Abortion, IncompleteAbortion, InducedAnimalsChinaFemaleHumansMifepristonePregnancyRatsUterine HemorrhageMifepristoneHaipiaoxiao ()herb pairQiancao ()uterine hemorrhageweight ratio

Identifiers

PMID36083483
PMCPMC9924793
OpenAlexW4295088252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.