Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36083448›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Testing Phylogenetic Stability with Variable Taxon Sampling.

Christopher Lowell Edward Powell, Fabia Ursula Battistuzzi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. TADA: taxonomy-aware dataset aggregator.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher Lowell Edward PowellDepartment of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA.
Fabia Ursula BattistuzziDepartment of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA. battistu@oakland.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past three decades, computational capabilities have grown at such a rapid rate that they have given rise to many computationally heavy science fields such as phylogenomics. As increasingly more genomes are sequenced in the three domains of life, larger and more species-complete phylogenetic tree reconstructions are leading to a better understanding of the tree of life and the evolutionary histories in deep times. However, these large datasets pose unique challenges from a modeling and computational perspective: accurately describing the evolutionary process of thousands of species is still beyond the capability of current models, while the computational burden limits our ability to test multiple hypotheses. Thus, it is common practice to reduce the size of a dataset by selecting species to represent a clade (taxon sampling). Unfortunately, this process is subjective, and comparisons of large tree of life studies show that choice and number of species used in a dataset can alter the topology obtained. Thus, taxon sampling is, in itself, a process that needs to be fully investigated to determine its effect on phylogenetic stability. Here, we present the theory and practical application of an automated pipeline that can be easily implemented to explore the effect of taxon sampling on phylogenetic reconstructions. The application of this approach was recently discussed in a study of Terrabacteria and shows its power in investigating the accuracy of deep nodes of a phylogeny.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenomePhylogenyEvolutionMaximum likelihoodPhylogeneticsPhylogenomicsTaxon samplingTree buildingTree of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.