Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36083412›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2022

Fatalistic cancer beliefs and self-reported cancer screening behaviors among diverse urban residents.

Laura C Pinheiro, Orysya Soroka, Dominic T Razon, Francesse Antoine, Julia Rothman, Margaux J Kanis, Uqba Khan, Rulla M Tamimi, David Nanus, Erica Phillips

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura C PinheiroDivision of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 338 East 66thStreet, Box #46, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Orysya SorokaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 338 East 66thStreet, Box #46, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Dominic T RazonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 338 East 66thStreet, Box #46, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Francesse AntoineDivision of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 338 East 66thStreet, Box #46, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Julia RothmanCollege of Human Ecology, Cornell University - Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Margaux J KanisDivision of Gynecological Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, NY, Brooklyn, USA.
Uqba KhanDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, NY, Brooklyn, USA.
Rulla M TamimiSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell, New York, New York, NY, USA.
David NanusSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Weill Cornell, New York, New York, NY, USA.
Erica PhillipsDivision of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 338 East 66thStreet, Box #46, New York, NY, 10021, USA. erp2001@med.cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6803-2442
Cornell University · USPenn Presbyterian Medical Center · USNewYork–Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital · US

Funding

Project 3-Community Health workers United to Reduce Colorectal cancer and CVD among people at Higher risk (CHURCH)P50MD017341 · NIMHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TERRY, MARY BETH · 2021 to 2025
$23.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer fatalism-the belief that death is inevitable when cancer is present-has been identified as a barrier to cancer screening, detection, and treatment. Our study examined the relationship between self-reported cancer fatalism and adherence to cancer screening guidelines of the breasts, cervix, colon, and prostate among a diverse sample of urban-dwelling adults in Brooklyn, New York. Between May 2019 and August 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of adults 40 + years of age (n = 2,341) residing in Brooklyn neighborhoods with high cancer mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the odds of reporting cancer screening completion across three fatalistic cancer belief categories (low, med, high). Participants' median age was 61 (IQR 51, 71) years, 61% were women, 49% self-identified as non-Hispanic black, 11% Hispanic, 4% Asian, and 6% more than one race. There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of low, some, or high fatalistic beliefs identified among male respondents compared to women. Among women, we observed that high fatalistic cancer beliefs were associated with higher odds (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.10-3.65) of completing breast but not cervical (1.04; CI 0.55-1.99) or colon (1.54; CI 0.88-2.69) cancer screening. Men with high fatalistic cancer beliefs had a trend towards lower odds of prostate screening (OR 0.53: 95% CI 0.18-1.57) compared to men with low fatalistic beliefs, but neither was statistically significant. Findings suggest that high fatalistic cancer beliefs may be an important factor in cancer screening utilization among women. Further examination in longitudinal cohorts with a larger sample of men may be needed in order to identify any significant effect.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportUrban PopulationCancer screeningCommunicationFatalismRisk reductionSocial networks

Identifiers

PMID36083412
OpenAlexW4295008555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.