Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36083280›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Automatically tracking feeding behavior in populations of foraging

Elsa Bonnard, Jun Liu, Nicolina Zjacic, Luis Alvarez, Monika Scholz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolution of sensory systems underlies the emergence of predatory feeding behaviors in nematodes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. eNeuro · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Elsa Bonnard *Max Planck Research Group Neural Information Flow, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6363-1684
Jun Liu *Max Planck Research Group Neural Information Flow, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6472-3871
Nicolina ZjacicMax Planck Research Group Neural Information Flow, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6413-7386
Luis AlvarezMax Planck Research Group Neural Information Flow, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1027-2291
Monika ScholzMax Planck Research Group Neural Information Flow, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior - caesar, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2186-410X
University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsAnimalsEatingFeeding BehaviorLocomotionCaenorhabditis elegans Proteinsbehavior trackingC. eleganscomputational biologydevelopmentfeedingforagingneurosciencepumpingsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID36083280
PMCPMC9462848
OpenAlexW4295086972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.