ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023
Translating and evaluating historic phenotyping algorithms using SNOMED CT.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using ontologies to facilitate healthcare process mining and analysis.Journal of intelligent information systems · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness of metformin and alogliptin combination therapy versus metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: an emulated target trial.BMC endocrine disorders · 2025Article
- Predicting incident dementia in community-dwelling older adults using primary and secondary care data from electronic health records.Brain communications · 2025Article
- Comparing natural language processing representations of coded disease sequences for prediction in electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Checklist and guidance on creating codelists for routinely collected health data research.NIHR open research · 2024Article
- UK Electronic Healthcare Records for Research: A Scientometric Analysis of Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and COVID-19 Publications.Pragmatic and observational research · 2024Review
- Geographical and practical challenges in the implementation of digital health passports for cross-border COVID-19 pandemic management: a narrative review and framework for solutions.Globalization and health · 2023Review
- Determining prescriptions in electronic healthcare record data: methods for development of standardized, reproducible drug codelists.JAMIA open · 2023Article
- Advancing phenotyping through informatics innovation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePatient phenotype definitions based on terminologies are required for the computational use of electronic health records. Within UK primary care research databases, such definitions have typically been represented as flat lists of Read terms, but Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) (a widely employed international reference terminology) enables the use of relationships between concepts, which could facilitate the phenotyping process. We implemented SNOMED CT-based phenotyping approaches and investigated their performance in the CPRD Aurum primary care database. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe developed SNOMED CT phenotype definitions for 3 exemplar diseases: diabetes mellitus, asthma, and heart failure, using 3 methods: "primary" (primary concept and its descendants), "extended" (primary concept, descendants, and additional relations), and "value set" (based on text searches of term descriptions). We also derived SNOMED CT codelists in a semiautomated manner for 276 disease phenotypes used in a study of health across the lifecourse. Cohorts selected using each codelist were compared to "gold standard" manually curated Read codelists in a sample of 500 000 patients from CPRD Aurum.
resultsSNOMED CT codelists selected a similar set of patients to Read, with F1 scores exceeding 0.93, and age and sex distributions were similar. The "value set" and "extended" codelists had slightly greater recall but lower precision than "primary" codelists. We were able to represent 257 of the 276 phenotypes by a single concept hierarchy, and for 135 phenotypes, the F1 score was greater than 0.9.
conclusionsSNOMED CT provides an efficient way to define disease phenotypes, resulting in similar patient populations to manually curated codelists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.