Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36083213›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023

Translating and evaluating historic phenotyping algorithms using SNOMED CT.

Musaab Elkheder, Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Muhammad Qummer Ul Arfeen, Valerie Kuan, R Thomas Lumbers, Spiros Denaxas, Anoop D Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Using ontologies to facilitate healthcare process mining and analysis.Journal of intelligent information systems · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Advancing phenotyping through informatics innovation.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Musaab ElkhederInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Arturo Gonzalez-IzquierdoInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Muhammad Qummer Ul ArfeenInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Valerie KuanInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
R Thomas LumbersInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9077-4741
Spiros DenaxasInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9612-7791
Anoop D ShahInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-5724

Funding

British Heart Foundation AA/18/6/24223British Heart Foundation SP/19/3/34678Chief Scientist OfficeDepartment of Health AI_AWARD01864Department of Health COV-LT-0009Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10314Medical Research Council MC_PC_20030Medical Research Council MC_PC_20059Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1NIHR funded Multimorbidity Mechanism and Therapeutics Research Collaborative MR/V033867/1NIHR Strategic Priorities Award in Multimorbidity Research MR/V033867/1Wellcome Trust 086091/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatient phenotype definitions based on terminologies are required for the computational use of electronic health records. Within UK primary care research databases, such definitions have typically been represented as flat lists of Read terms, but Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) (a widely employed international reference terminology) enables the use of relationships between concepts, which could facilitate the phenotyping process. We implemented SNOMED CT-based phenotyping approaches and investigated their performance in the CPRD Aurum primary care database. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed SNOMED CT phenotype definitions for 3 exemplar diseases: diabetes mellitus, asthma, and heart failure, using 3 methods: "primary" (primary concept and its descendants), "extended" (primary concept, descendants, and additional relations), and "value set" (based on text searches of term descriptions). We also derived SNOMED CT codelists in a semiautomated manner for 276 disease phenotypes used in a study of health across the lifecourse. Cohorts selected using each codelist were compared to "gold standard" manually curated Read codelists in a sample of 500 000 patients from CPRD Aurum.

resultsSNOMED CT codelists selected a similar set of patients to Read, with F1 scores exceeding 0.93, and age and sex distributions were similar. The "value set" and "extended" codelists had slightly greater recall but lower precision than "primary" codelists. We were able to represent 257 of the 276 phenotypes by a single concept hierarchy, and for 135 phenotypes, the F1 score was greater than 0.9.

conclusionsSNOMED CT provides an efficient way to define disease phenotypes, resulting in similar patient populations to manually curated codelists.

Indexed as

AsthmaSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsHumanselectronic health recordsontologyphenotypeSNOMED CTterminology

Identifiers

PMID36083213
PMCPMC9846670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.