Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36083212›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

A survey of automated methods for biomedical text simplification.

Brian Ondov, Kush Attal, Dina Demner-Fushman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Caught in the Web of Words: Do LLMs Fall for Spin in Medical Literature?Proceedings of machine learning research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. APPLS: Evaluating Evaluation Metrics for Plain Language Summarization.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2024
    Article
  10. Sentence-Aligned Simplification of Biomedical Abstracts.Artificial intelligence in medicine. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (2005- ) · 2024
    Article
  11. Text and Audio Simplification: Human vs. ChatGPT.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Meeting the information and communication needs of health disparate populations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian OndovComputational Health Research Branch, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0740-1793
Kush AttalComputational Health Research Branch, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3635-9368
Dina Demner-FushmanComputational Health Research Branch, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4361-5799
United States National Library of Medicine · US

Funding

Intramural Research Program of the National Library of Medicine (NLM)NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePlain language in medicine has long been advocated as a way to improve patient understanding and engagement. As the field of Natural Language Processing has progressed, increasingly sophisticated methods have been explored for the automatic simplification of existing biomedical text for consumers. We survey the literature in this area with the goals of characterizing approaches and applications, summarizing existing resources, and identifying remaining challenges. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe search English language literature using lists of synonyms for both the task (eg, "text simplification") and the domain (eg, "biomedical"), and searching for all pairs of these synonyms using Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, PubMed, ACL Anthology, and DBLP. We expand search terms based on results and further include any pertinent papers not in the search results but cited by those that are.

resultsWe find 45 papers that we deem relevant to the automatic simplification of biomedical text, with data spanning 7 natural languages. Of these (nonexclusively), 32 describe tools or methods, 13 present data sets or resources, and 9 describe impacts on human comprehension. Of the tools or methods, 22 are chiefly procedural and 10 are chiefly neural.

conclusionsThough neural methods hold promise for this task, scarcity of parallel data has led to continued development of procedural methods. Various low-resource mitigations have been proposed to advance neural methods, including paragraph-level and unsupervised models and augmentation of neural models with procedural elements drawing from knowledge bases. However, high-quality parallel data will likely be crucial for developing fully automated biomedical text simplification.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingUnified Medical Language SystemHumansLanguagePubMedSemanticshealth literacymachine learningnatural language processingplain languagetext simplification

Identifiers

PMID36083212
PMCPMC10161533
OpenAlexW4295077729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.