Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36082693›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Can we have a second helping? A preregistered direct replication study on the neurobiological mechanisms underlying self-control.

Christin Scholz, Hang-Yee Chan, Russell A Poldrack, Denise T D de Ridder, Ale Smidts, Laura Nynke van der Laan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Goal-Dependent Hippocampal Representations Facilitate Self-Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christin ScholzAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6567-7504
Hang-Yee ChanAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7179-9436
Russell A PoldrackDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6755-0259
Denise T D de RidderDepartment of Social, Health and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8237-9506
Ale SmidtsRotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6699-1172
Laura Nynke van der LaanDepartment of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4307-0888

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-control is of vital importance for human wellbeing. Hare et al. (2009) were among the first to provide empirical evidence on the neural correlates of self-control. This seminal study profoundly impacted theory and empirical work across multiple fields. To solidify the empirical evidence supporting self-control theory, we conducted a preregistered replication of this work. Further, we tested the robustness of the findings across analytic strategies. Participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while rating 50 food items on healthiness and tastiness and making choices about food consumption. We closely replicated the original analysis pipeline and supplemented it with additional exploratory analyses to follow-up on unexpected findings and to test the sensitivity of results to key analytical choices. Our replication data provide support for the notion that decisions are associated with a value signal in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), which integrates relevant choice attributes to inform a final decision. We found that vmPFC activity was correlated with goal values regardless of the amount of self-control and it correlated with both taste and health in self-controllers but only taste in non-self-controllers. We did not find strong support for the hypothesized role of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) in self-control. The absence of statistically significant group differences in dlPFC activity during successful self-control in our sample contrasts with the notion that dlPFC involvement is required in order to effectively integrate longer-term goals into subjective value judgments. Exploratory analyses highlight the sensitivity of results (in terms of effect size) to the analytical strategy, for instance, concerning the approach to region-of-interest analysis.

Indexed as

Self-ControlHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal CortexTastedlPFCfMRIreplicationself-controlvmPFC

Identifiers

PMID36082693
PMCPMC9582371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.