ArticleCancer medicine2023
Application of interpretable machine learning algorithms to predict distant metastasis in osteosarcoma.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Molecular Insights and Computational Modeling of Multiple Myeloma and Osteosarcoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Machine learning algorithms and web-based prognostic tool for different histological subtypes of osteosarcoma: a retrospective cohort.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of machine learning models for predicting lymph node metastasis in cutaneous malignant melanoma: a large population-based study.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Advancing bone tumor detection in older adults: the impact of AI-enhanced medical imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Prediction of High-Dose Methotrexate Blood Concentration in Osteosarcoma Patients Using Machine Learning.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Implementation of a Machine Learning Approach Evaluating Risk Factors for Complications after Single-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Prediction of lateral lymph node metastasis with short diameter less than 8 mm in papillary thyroid carcinoma based on radiomics.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Bone scintigraphy based on deep learning model and modified growth optimizer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Using machine learning methods to study the tumour microenvironment and its biomarkers in osteosarcoma metastasis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Application of interpretable machine learning algorithms to predict distant metastasis in osteosarcoma.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Application of machine learning techniques in real-world research to predict the risk of liver metastasis in rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Acute Liver Injury in Sepsis Patients.Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shockArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteosarcoma is well-established as the most common bone cancer in children and adolescents. Patients with localized disease have different prognoses and management than those with metastasis at the time of diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to explore potential risk factors for metastatic disease.
methodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database was used to identify patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma between 2004 and 2015. We developed prediction models for distant metastasis using six machine learning (ML) techniques, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GaussianNB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), and k-nearest neighbor algorithm (kNN). The adaptive synthetic (ADASYN) technique was used to deal with imbalanced data. The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) analysis generated visualized explanations for each patient. Finally, the average precision (AP), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1 score, precision-recall curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were conducted to evaluate the models' effectiveness.
resultsThe six machine learning algorithms achieved AP of 0.661-0.781 for predicting distant metastasis. The RF model yielded the best performance with an accuracy of 71.8 percent and an AP of 0.781 and was highly dependent on tumor size, primary surgery, and age. SHAP analysis provided model-independent interpretation, highlighting significant clinical factors associated with the risk of metastasis in osteosarcoma patients.
conclusionsAn accurate machine learning-based prediction model was established for metastasis in osteosarcoma patients to help clinicians during clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.