ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2022
Comparison of some biochemical markers between early-onset and late-onset colorectal precancerous lesions: A single-center retrospective study.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age-diet interactions significantly influence intratumoral gene expression, gut microbiome signature and tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Obesity and early-onset colorectal cancer risk: emerging clinical evidence and biological mechanisms.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Molecular genetics of early-onset colorectal cancer.World journal of biological chemistry · 2023Review
- Comparison of some biochemical markers between early-onset and late-onset colorectal precancerous lesions: A single-center retrospective study.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveGiven that the onset of diseases including colorectal cancer precursors is affecting younger individuals and that obesity is an important risk factor for early-onset, we conducted a study to explore the biochemical profile of differences in serum between early-onset patients and late-onset colorectal precancerous lesions.
methodsA total of 1447 patients, including 469 early-onset patients and 978 late-onset patients, were enrolled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (FAHNU), of which there were 311 sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/P) and 1136 normal adenomas. The distribution of the included categorical variables was compared via Pearson's chi-squared test, whereas continuous variables were compared by using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test and ANOVA.
resultsCompared with late-onset patients, the levels of total bilirubin and HDL-C were lower (p < 0.05), whereas triglyceride and uric acid levels were higher, in early-onset patients. Interestingly, in the subgroup analysis, triglyceride and uric acid levels remained at higher levels, whereas HDL-C remained at lower levels, in early-onset patients than in late-onset patients. Other characteristics, such as LDL-C, drinking, γ-GT, and the N/L ratio, were similar between the two groups. An additional analysis of the association of tumor size with markers showed that lower levels of HDL-C and higher levels of uric acid were associated with increased tumor size (p < 0.05).
conclusionsEarly-onset CRC precursor cases exhibit higher levels of triglycerides and lower levels of HDL-C than late-onset cases. Additionally, levels of HDL-C are negatively associated with tumor size, whereas uric acid was positively correlated with tumor size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.