Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36082374›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2022

Pediatric Ventilation Liberation: A Survey of International Practice Among 555 Pediatric Intensivists.

Jeremy M Loberger, Caitlin M Campbell, José Colleti, Santiago Borasino, Samer Abu-Sultaneh, Robinder G Khemani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reply to HavanAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeremy M LobergerDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Caitlin M CampbellUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, Birmingham, AL.
José ColletiDepartment of Pediatrics, Hospital Assunção Rede D'Or, SB do Campo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Santiago BorasinoDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Section of Cardiac Critical Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Samer Abu-SultanehDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine and Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN.
Robinder G KhemaniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BR

Funding

Pediatric Ventilator Liberation Consensus ConferenceR13HD102137 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI ABU-SULTANEH, SAMER, KHEMANI, ROBINDER · 2020 to 2021
$75k
NICHD NIH HHS R13 HD102137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric ventilation liberation has limited evidence, likely resulting in wide practice variation. To inform future work, practice patterns must first be described.

objectivesDescribe international pediatric ventilation liberation practices and regional practice variation. DESIGN SETTING AND

participantsInternational cross-sectional electronic survey. Nontrainee pediatric medical and cardiac critical care physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Practices focusing on spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) eligibility, SBT practice, non-SBT extubation readiness bundle elements, and post-extubation respiratory support.

resultsFive-hundred fifty-five responses representing 47 countries were analyzed. Most respondents reported weaning followed by an SBT (86.4%). The top SBT eligibility variables reported were positive end-expiratory pressure (95%), Fio CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: International pediatric ventilation liberation practices are heterogeneous. Future study is needed to address key evidence gaps. Many practice differences were associated with respondent region, which must be considered in international study design.

Indexed as

clinical pathwayextubationmechanical ventilationpediatric intensive care unitpediatricsrespiratory therapy

Identifiers

PMID36082374
PMCPMC9444408
OpenAlexW4294805251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.