Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36082304›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2022

Machine learning algorithm performance evaluation in structural magnetic resonance imaging-based classification of pediatric bipolar disorders type I patients.

Ruhai Dou, Weijia Gao, Qingmin Meng, Xiaotong Zhang, Weifang Cao, Liangfeng Kuang, Jinpeng Niu, Yongxin Guo, Dong Cui, Qing Jiao and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ruhai DouDepartment of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Weijia GaoDepartment of Child Psychology, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qingmin MengDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Taian Central Hospital, Taian, China.
Xiaotong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Weifang CaoDepartment of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Liangfeng KuangDepartment of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Jinpeng NiuDepartment of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Yongxin GuoDepartment of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Dong CuiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China.
Qing JiaoDepartment of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Jianfeng QiuDepartment of Radiology, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Taian, China.
Linyan SuKey Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health of Hunan Province, Mental Health Institute of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Guangming LuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis based on clinical assessment of pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) may sometimes lead to misdiagnosis in clinical practice. For the past several years, machine learning (ML) methods were introduced for the classification of bipolar disorder (BD), which were helpful in the diagnosis of BD. In this study, brain cortical thickness and subcortical volume of 33 PBD-I patients and 19 age-sex matched healthy controls (HCs) were extracted from the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and set as features for classification. The dimensionality reduced feature subset, which was filtered by Lasso or f_classif, was sent to the six classifiers (logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest classifier, naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbor, and AdaBoost algorithm), and the classifiers were trained and tested. Among all the classifiers, the top two classifiers with the highest accuracy were LR (84.19%) and SVM (82.80%). Feature selection was performed in the six algorithms to obtain the most important variables including the right middle temporal gyrus and bilateral pallidum, which is consistent with structural and functional anomalous changes in these brain regions in PBD patients. These findings take the computer-aided diagnosis of BD a step forward.

Indexed as

adaptive boosting classifierk-nearest neighborlogistic regressionmachine learningnaïve Bayespediatric bipolar disorderrandom forestsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID36082304
PMCPMC9445985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.