ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Risk factors and management of biliary stones after living donor liver transplant and its effect on graft outcome.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Successful application of percutaneous endoscopic cholangioscopy + electrohydraulic lithotripsy for hepatolithiasis post-liver transplantation: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2024Article
- Improving the radiological diagnosis of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: Current approaches and future challenges.World journal of transplantation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bile stones are associated with numerous complications in liver transplant recipients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been proven to be safe and highly effective in dealing with most post-transplant biliary complications. Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the possible risk factors for bile stone formation on top of biliary stricture, the effects of stones on graft outcomes, and their management. Methods: This case-control study included 83 patients who underwent living donor liver transplant (LDLT) and suffered from postoperative biliary stricture with or without stones. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 ( Results: The frequency of hepatitis C virus (HCV) was significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (71.4% vs. 47.3%, Conclusion: Positive HCV, biliary drain insertion, donor's BMI, and serum cholesterol level were independent risk factors for developing bile stones on top of biliary strictures. Biliary stones were associated with high episodes of acute graft rejection, and they could be successfully managed by the ERCP modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.