Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36082253›Full record

ArticleEuropean stroke journal2022

Impact on functional outcome of an adaptive Stroke Unit based system of care for patients undergoing endovascular treatment during pandemic times.

Jon Equiza, Patricia de la Riva, José Angel Larrea, Juan Marta-Enguita, Inés Albájar, Alex Lüttich, Eñaut Garmendia, Maitane Alonso, Ana de Arce, Noemí Díez and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European stroke journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jon EquizaStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0984-2645
Patricia de la RivaStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
José Angel LarreaInterventional Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Juan Marta-EnguitaStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Inés AlbájarStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4460-1775
Alex LüttichInterventional Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Eñaut GarmendiaInterventional Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Maitane AlonsoInterventional Neuroradiology Section, Department of Radiology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Ana de ArceStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Noemí DíezStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Félix GonzalezStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Pablo IruzubietaStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Naroa SulibarriaStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Josep PuigDepartment of Radiology, Dr. Josep Trueta University Hospital and Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain.
Maite Martínez-ZabaletaStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID19 pandemic collapsed intensive care units (ICUs) all around the world, conditioning systems of care (SOC) for other critical conditions such as severe ischemic stroke requiring endovascular treatment (EVT). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of an adaptive Stroke Unit (SU) based SOC on functional outcomes, with the goal of avoiding both general anesthesia (GA) and ICU admission in stroke patients treated with EVT. Material and methods: We performed an observational study comparing data from our traditional ICU-GA based SOC and the adaptive SU-Conscious Sedation (CS) based SOC (consecutive patients undergoing EVT 1 year prior and after onset of the pandemic). Primary outcome was 90-days modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and secondary outcomes included, among others, in-hospital complications, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: A total of 210 EVT were performed during the study period (107 under the traditional-SOC and 103 under the adaptive-SOC). A significantly greater proportion of patient was treated under CS (15.9% vs 57.3%; Conclusion: In our case, an adaptive SOC that combined both preference for CS and postprocedural care in SU was associated with better functional outcomes and reduced healthcare resource use for patients undergoing EVT.

Indexed as

conscious sedationgeneral anesthesiainterventionmechanical thrombectomyreperfusionStrokestroke unitstreatment

Identifiers

PMID36082253
PMCPMC9446315
OpenAlexW4281932316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.