Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36082228›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

Low test-retest reliability of a protocol for assessing somatosensory cortex excitability generated from sensory nerves of the lower back.

Katja Ehrenbrusthoff, Cormac G Ryan, Denis J Martin, Volker Milnik, Hubert R Dinse, Christian Grüneberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Katja EhrenbrusthoffDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit, Bochum, Germany.
Cormac G RyanSchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Denis J MartinSchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Volker MilnikNeurological Clinic, Düren, Germany.
Hubert R DinseDepartment of Neurology, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil GmbH, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Christian GrünebergDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit, Bochum, Germany.
Hochschule für Gesundheit - University of Applied Sciences · DETeesside University · GBBG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum · DEKrankenhaus Düren · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In people with chronic low back pain (CLBP), maladaptive structural and functional changes on a cortical level have been identified. On a functional level, somatosensory cortical excitability has been shown to be reduced in chronic pain conditions, resulting in cortical disinhibition. The occurrence of structural and/or functional maladaptive cortical changes in people with CLBP could play a role in maintaining the pain. There is currently no measurement protocol for cortical excitability that employs stimulation directly to the lower back. We developed a protocol for the measurement of single pulse somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) waveforms and paired-pulse behavior (PPB) generated from sensory nerves of the lower back and quantified its test-retest reliability in a sample of 30 healthy individuals to gain insights into the normal variability of cortical responses, which could then be compared to results from people with CLBP. We investigated cortical excitability by measuring SEPs and PPB. PPB was defined as the ratio of the amplitude of the second cortical response (A2s) divided by the first cortical response (A1). A2s was determined by subtracting the response to single-pulse stimuli from the paired pulse stimuli response to account for linear superposition effects. The test-retest reliability of the protocol was very poor with no evidence of systematic bias but a high amount of random variability between sessions. There was no significant difference in the right side PPB for session 1 (Mean ratio A2s/A1 = 0.66, SD = 0.54) and session 2 (Mean ratio A2s/A1 = 0.94, SD = 1.56); mean session difference [(95% CI) = -0.44 (-1.23 to 0.34);

Indexed as

cortical disinhibitioncortical excitabilitypaired-pulse behaviorsomatosensory evoked potentialstest–retest reliability

Identifiers

PMID36082228
PMCPMC9445117
OpenAlexW4293252718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.