Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36082135›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing : a publication of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society2021

Systematic Assessment of MODTRAN Emulators for Atmospheric Correction.

Jorge Vicent Servera, Juan Pablo Rivera-Caicedo, Jochem Verrelst, Jordi Muñoz-Marí, Neus Sabater, Béatrice Berthelot, Gustau Camps-Valls, José Moreno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing : a publication of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural Network Emulation of Synthetic Hyperspectral Sentinel-2-like Imagery with Uncertainty.IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing · 2023
    Article
  2. Atmospheric Lengthscales for Global VSWIR Imaging Spectroscopy.Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jorge Vicent ServeraMagellium, 31520 Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9291-064X
Juan Pablo Rivera-Caicedothe Departamento of Secretaría de investigación y postgrado, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Autonomous University of Nayarit, Tepic 63173, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-1448
Jochem Verrelstthe Image Processing Laboratory, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-2081
Jordi Muñoz-Maríthe Image Processing Laboratory, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3014-3921
Neus Sabaterthe Finnish Meteorological Institute, 00560 Helsinki, Finland.
Béatrice BerthelotMagellium, 31520 Toulouse, France.
Gustau Camps-Vallsthe Image Processing Laboratory, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1683-2138
José Morenothe Image Processing Laboratory, University of Valencia, 46100 Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5283-3333

Funding

European Research Council 755617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atmospheric radiative transfer models (RTMs) simulate the light propagation in the Earth's atmosphere. With the evolution of RTMs, their increase in complexity makes them impractical in routine processing such as atmospheric correction. To overcome their computational burden, standard practice is to interpolate a multidimensional lookup table (LUT) of prestored simulations. However, accurate interpolation relies on large LUTs, which still implies large computation times for their generation and interpolation. In recent years, emulation has been proposed as an alternative to LUT interpolation. Emulation approximates the RTM outputs by a statistical regression model trained with a low number of RTM runs. However, a concern is whether the emulator reaches sufficient accuracy for atmospheric correction. Therefore, we have performed a systematic assessment of key aspects that impact the precision of emulating MODTRAN: 1) regression algorithm; 2) training database size; 3) dimensionality reduction (DR) method and a number of components; and 4) spectral resolution. The Gaussian processes regression (GPR) was found the most accurate emulator. The principal component analysis remains a robust DR method and nearly 20 components reach sufficient precision. Based on a database of 1000 samples covering a broad range of atmospheric conditions, GPR emulators can reconstruct the simulated spectral data with relative errors below 1% for the 95th percentile. These emulators reduce the processing time from days to minutes, preserving sufficient accuracy for atmospheric correction and providing model uncertainties and derivatives. We provide a set of guidelines and tools to design and generate accurate emulators for satellite data processing applications.

Indexed as

Atmospheric correctionemulationhyperspectralMODTRANradiative transfer

Identifiers

PMID36082135
PMCPMC7613370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.