ArticleGland surgery2022
Risk factors for chest wall depression after implant insertion for breast reconstruction: a retrospective quantitative study.
Article in Gland surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- DIEP Flap Weights in Immediate 1-stage and 2-stage Breast Reconstruction: Considering Chest Wall Deformity.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Chest wall depression caused by tissue expander use in breast reconstruction with recoiling following expander removal: a case report.Gland surgery · 2023Article
- Editorial: risk factors for chest wall depression in breast reconstruction.Gland surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implant-based reconstruction represents the most common form of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Although the complication rate has lowered owing to the current advances, various implant-related complications are still a problem. There have been few reports discussing chest wall deformation following implant insertion. The aim of this study was to quantify chest wall depression (CWD) after breast implant insertion and identify possible risk factors. Methods: Patients who underwent unilateral direct-to-implant reconstruction were included in the study. We measured the pre- and postoperative antero-posterior length of the chest wall and used a CWD ratio to measure the change in length. Multivariate analysis was performed with factors with P values of <0.2 in univariate analyses to identify factors associated with CWD. Results: A total of 57 patients were included in this study. The pre- and postoperative difference of antero-posterior length was statistically significant using a paired Conclusions: This study showed the possibility of CWD following implant insertion. Surgeons and specialists should be aware of the possibility and risk factors of CWD following implant insertion to better inform patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.