Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36082053›Full record

ReviewACS catalysis2022

Broken Promises? On the Continued Challenges Faced in Catalytic Hydrophosphination.

Samantha Lau, Thomas M Hood, Ruth L Webster

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS catalysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Breaking the Mold: Electrophilic Hydrophosphanation Emerges.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Photolytic Hydrophosphination: Insights Into Catalyzed and Uncatalyzed Processes.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A Revisit of Co(PMeOrganometallics · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Photocatalytic Hydrophosphination Using Calcium Precatalysts.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samantha LauDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9936-117X
Thomas M HoodDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2506-2753
Ruth L WebsterDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9199-7579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this Perspective, we discuss what we perceive to be the continued challenges faced in catalytic hydrophosphination chemistry. Currently the literature is dominated by catalysts, many of which are highly effective, that generate the same phosphorus architectures, e.g., anti-Markovnikov products from the reaction of activated alkenes and alkynes with diarylphosphines. We highlight the state of the art in stereoselective hydrophosphination and the scope and limitations of chemoselective hydrophosphination with primary phosphines and PH

Identifiers

PMID36082053
PMCPMC9442583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.