Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36082012›Full record

ArticleDiabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association2022

Patient Decision-Making About Self-Disclosure of a Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study.

Christy J W Ledford, Charisse Villareal, Elizabeth W Williams, Lauren A Cafferty, Jeremy T Jackson, Dean A Seehusen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Support needs for chronic disease self-management among persons attending a Primary Health Care facility in Victor Khanye, Mpumalanga.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christy J W LedfordDepartment of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
Charisse VillarealNational Capital Consortium Family Medicine Residency, Fort Belvoir, VA.
Elizabeth W WilliamsEglin Family Medicine Residency, Eglin Air Force Base, FL.
Lauren A CaffertyDepartment of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
Jeremy T JacksonDepartment of Family Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6140-1196
Dean A SeehusenDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Henry M. Jackson Foundation · USAugusta University · USCapital University · USEglin Air Force Base · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Effective self-management of type 2 diabetes requires receiving support, which can result from disclosing the diagnosis to a support network, including coworkers, family, and friends. As a primarily invisible disease, diabetes allows people to choose whether to disclose. This study qualitatively explores the factors that influence a person's decision to disclose diabetes to others. Methods: Research coordinators recruited 22 interview participants, ranging in age from 32 to 64 years, whose medical records included a diagnosis code for type 2 diabetes. Participants received care from one of two U.S. medical centers. Semi-structured interviews lasted approximately 1 hour and were audio-recorded and professionally transcribed. Verification strategies such as memo-keeping and maintaining methodological coherence/congruence were used throughout analysis to promote rigor. Results: In patients' descriptions of their decision-making processes regarding whether to disclose their diagnosis, six themes emerged. Three motivations prompted open disclosure: Conclusion: Based on our findings, we recommend three communicative actions for clinicians as they talk to patients about a diabetes diagnosis. First, clinicians should talk about the benefits of disclosure. Second, they should directly address stereotypes in an effort to de-stigmatize diabetes. Finally, clinicians can teach the skills of disclosure. As disclosure efficacy increases, a person's likelihood to disclose also increases. Individuals can use communication as a tool to gain the knowledge and support they need for diabetes self-management and to interrupt the continuing multigenerational development of diabetes within their family.

Identifiers

PMID36082012
PMCPMC9396723
OpenAlexW4206950076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.