Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36082000›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2022

Comprehending the evolution of gene editing platforms for crop trait improvement.

Priyanka Dhakate, Deepmala Sehgal, Samantha Vaishnavi, Atika Chandra, Apekshita Singh, Soom Nath Raina, Vijay Rani Rajpal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Priyanka DhakateNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, India.
Deepmala SehgalInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), México-Veracruz, Mexico.
Samantha VaishnaviDepartment of Botany, Central University of Jammu, Jammu, India.
Atika ChandraDepartment of Botany, Maitreyi College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Apekshita SinghAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, India.
Soom Nath RainaAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, India.
Vijay Rani RajpalDepartment of Botany, Hansraj College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Amity University · INUniversity of Delhi · INCentral University of Jammu · INCentro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo · MXNational Institute of Plant Genome Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) system was initially discovered as an underlying mechanism for conferring adaptive immunity to bacteria and archaea against viruses. Over the past decade, this has been repurposed as a genome-editing tool. Numerous gene editing-based crop improvement technologies involving CRISPR/Cas platforms individually or in combination with next-generation sequencing methods have been developed that have revolutionized plant genome-editing methodologies. Initially, CRISPR/Cas nucleases replaced the earlier used sequence-specific nucleases (SSNs), such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), to address the problem of associated off-targets. The adaptation of this platform led to the development of concepts such as epigenome editing, base editing, and prime editing. Epigenome editing employed epi-effectors to manipulate chromatin structure, while base editing uses base editors to engineer precise changes for trait improvement. Newer technologies such as prime editing have now been developed as a "search-and-replace" tool to engineer all possible single-base changes. Owing to the availability of these, the field of genome editing has evolved rapidly to develop crop plants with improved traits. In this review, we present the evolution of the CRISPR/Cas system into new-age methods of genome engineering across various plant species and the impact they have had on tweaking plant genomes and associated outcomes on crop improvement initiatives.

Indexed as

base editingCRISPR/Cas systemcrop improvementepigenome editingprime editing

Identifiers

PMID36082000
PMCPMC9445674
OpenAlexW4292714546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.