ReviewHealth equity2022
A Systematic Literature Review of Community-Based Participatory Health Research with Sexual and Gender Minority Communities.
Review in Health equity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Looking back, I didn't feel even a little bit safe": A mixed methods examination of transgender women's help-seeking and attainment following interpersonal victimization.The American journal of orthopsychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
- "Pink is my least favorite color": experiences of sexual minority women and partners navigating breast cancer.Journal of psychosocial oncology · 2026Article
- "Uncle maria you look beautiful": Experiences of family acceptance among transgender women of color in South Florida.International journal of transgender health · 2026Article
- The Paradox of Belonging: Minority Stress, Community Belongingness, and Subjective Well-Being Among Black LGBTQ+ Adults.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Role of Power in Co-Approaches to Health Research: Insights From Spain and the United Kingdom With a Rapid Review of Reviews.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Review
- Article
- Identity abuse against sexual and gender minority communities: The Being LGBTQI+ in Ireland study.PloS one · 2025Article
- "They Think Transgender is Like Something on the Side:" Perceptions of Transgender Women of Color of Cisgender Members of the LGBTQIA+ "Community".Journal of homosexuality · 2025Article
- Chronic pain in transgender and gender-diverse youth: a biopsychosocial perspective.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Developing a mobile application for gender-affirming voice training: A community-engaged approach.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
- It's time to transform the LGBT health research landscape in Malaysia.PLOS mental health · 2024Article
- Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities in health services; diversity, equity, and inclusion; and implementation science.Expert review of hematology · 2023Article
- Changing language, changes lives: Learning the lexicon of LGBTQ+ health equity.Research in nursing & health · 2022Article
- Measurement of Adolescent Dating Violence in Sexual Minority Youth: A Scoping Review.Aggression and violent behaviorArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The objective was to review sexual and gender minority (SGM) health research studies to gain an understanding of how the community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework has been operationalized. Methods: We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to conduct a review of all SGM health research studies published in the past 10 years that cited a CBPR approach (PROSPERO Registration No. CRD42016036608). CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO databases were systematically searched in October 2020. Dimensions of community involvement (e.g., shared decision-making; flexibility to community needs and priorities) and the strength of evidence for each dimension were rated using guidance from the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality. Results: The 48 eligible articles identified reported a range of 0-11 (out of 13) community elements. Seven studies reported zero elements. Qualitative studies ( Conclusion: Adhering to the CBPR framework is challenging. The benefits of striving toward its principles, however, can move us toward transformative and sustainable social change within SGM communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.