Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081874›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke with the drip-and-ship model-Insights from the German Stroke Registry.

Jan Hendrik Schaefer, Natalia Kurka, Fee Keil, Marlies Wagner, Helmuth Steinmetz, Waltraud Pfeilschifter, Ferdinand O Bohmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Telemedical stroke care significantly improves patient outcome in rural areas: Long-term analysis of the German NEVAS network.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan Hendrik SchaeferDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Natalia KurkaDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Fee KeilDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marlies WagnerDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Helmuth SteinmetzDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Waltraud PfeilschifterDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ferdinand O BohmannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke has been widely established. Globally, stroke patients are transferred either directly to a thrombectomy center (DC) or a peripheral stroke unit with a "drip-and-ship" (DS) model. We aimed to determine differences between the DS and DC paradigms after EVT of acute stroke patients with large-vessel-occlusion (LVO) in the database of the German Stroke Registry (GSR). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of GSR patients between June 2015 and December 2019 in 23 German centers. Primary outcome was an ordinal shift analysis of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 90 days after index event. Secondary endpoints included time from symptom onset to recanalization and complications. Tertiary endpoint was the association of imaging strategies in DS admissions with outcome. Results: 2,813 patients were included in the DS and 3,819 in the DC group. After propensity score matching mRS after 90 days was higher in DS than DC admissions (OR 1.26; 95%-CI 1.13-1.40). Time from symptom-onset to flow-restoration was shorter in DC than DS (median 199.0 vs. 298.0 min; Conclusions: Clinical outcome was worse for EVT-eligible patients in the DS setting, even though patients were in a better state of health prior to stroke. A potentially mutable factor was the time delay of 99 min from symptom-onset to successful recanalization. Performing MRI before thrombectomy was associated with good outcome and MRI-ASPECTS was negatively correlated with mRS after 90 days.

Indexed as

direct-to-centerdrip-and-shipendovascular treatmentischemic strokemechanical thrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID36081874
PMCPMC9445809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.