Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081835›Full record

ArticleSurveys in geophysics2019

Variability and Uncertainty Challenges in Scaling Imaging Spectroscopy Retrievals and Validations from Leaves Up to Vegetation Canopies.

Zbyněk Malenovský, Lucie Homolová, Petr Lukeš, Henning Buddenbaum, Jochem Verrelst, Luis Alonso, Michael E Schaepman, Nicolas Lauret, Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surveys in geophysics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zbyněk MalenovskýSurveying and Spatial Sciences Group, School of Technology, Environments and Design, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 76, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1271-8103
Lucie HomolováGlobal Change Research Institute CAS, Remote Sensing Department, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Petr LukešGlobal Change Research Institute CAS, Remote Sensing Department, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Henning BuddenbaumEnvironmental Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany.
Jochem VerrelstImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), Parc Científic, Universitat de València, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Luis AlonsoImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), Parc Científic, Universitat de València, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Michael E SchaepmanRemote Sensing Laboratories, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicolas LauretCentre d'Etudes Spatiales de la Biosphère - UPS, CNES, CNRS, IRD, Université de Toulouse, 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
Jean-Philippe Gastellu-EtchegorryCentre d'Etudes Spatiales de la Biosphère - UPS, CNES, CNRS, IRD, Université de Toulouse, 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9, France.

Funding

European Research Council 755617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging spectroscopy of vegetation requires methods for scaling and generalizing optical signals that are reflected, transmitted and emitted in the solar wavelength domain from single leaves and observed at the level of canopies by proximal sensing, airborne and satellite spectroradiometers. The upscaling embedded in imaging spectroscopy retrievals and validations of plant biochemical and structural traits is challenged by natural variability and measurement uncertainties. Sources of the leaf-to-canopy upscaling variability and uncertainties are reviewed with respect to: (1) implementation of retrieval algorithms and (2) their parameterization and validation of quantitative products through in situ field measurements. The challenges are outlined and discussed for empirical and physical leaf and canopy radiative transfer modelling components, considering both forward and inverse modes. Discussion on optical remote sensing validation schemes includes also description of a multiscale validation concept and its advantages. Impacts of intraspecific and interspecific variability on collected field and laboratory measurements of leaf biochemical traits and optical properties are demonstrated for selected plant species, and field measurement uncertainty sources are listed and discussed specifically for foliar pigments and canopy leaf area index. The review concludes with the main findings and suggestions as how to reduce uncertainties and include variability in scaling vegetation imaging spectroscopy signals and functional traits of single leaves up to observations of whole canopies.

Indexed as

Imaging spectroscopyInversionMultiscale validationQuantitative remote sensingRadiative transfer modelsRetrieval of vegetation traitsScalingUncertaintyVariability

Identifiers

PMID36081835
PMCPMC7613335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.