Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081831›Full record

ArticleHealth services insights2022

Implementation of the VA Intensive Dysphagia Treatment Program: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.

Joanne Yee, Michael Pulia, Mary Jo Knobloch, Rachael Martinez, Sarah Daggett, Bridget Smith, Nan Musson, Nicole Rogus-Pulia

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services insights, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07622407 (A Transdisciplinary Interventions to MaximizE QuaLitY of Life After Cancer Through REHABilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07622407 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

A Transdisciplinary Interventions to MaximizE QuaLitY of Life After Cancer Through REHABilitation (TIMELY REHAB)

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2027 to 2030Enrolled74ConditionsHead and Neck Cancer, Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, DysphagiaArmsTIMELY REHAB
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joanne YeeGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA.
Michael PuliaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Mary Jo KnoblochGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA.
Rachael MartinezUnited States Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USA.
Sarah DaggettSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Bridget SmithCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
Nan MussonDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Nicole Rogus-PuliaGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital · USEdward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USUnited States Air Force · US

Funding

Impact of Novel Rehabilitative Approaches FOR Dysphagia in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasK76AG068590 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROGUS-PULIA, NICOLE M · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG068590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Intensive Dysphagia Treatment program serves a critical role in facilitating improvements to quality of care, standardization of outcomes, and increased access to structured therapy for Veterans with dysphagia. It has been implemented at 26 sites nationally and continues expanding. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was utilized for program evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation as reported by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) participating in the program. All 23 IDT program SLPs were invited to participate in an online survey. SLPs were asked to describe etiologies referred for SLP evaluation, most and least clinically useful program aspects, and characteristics of patients recommended for therapy. Qualitative interviews/focus groups were then conducted with 9 SLPs at 3 facilities with varying levels of program experience. Transcripts underwent systems engineering framework informed deductive thematic analysis. Interview/focus groups revealed overall positive feedback. Barriers included data entry challenges and provider understanding of long-term program goals, while facilitators included program structure enabling increased patient follow-up, outcomes tracking, and training in new treatment modalities. Through this evaluation process, program leadership garnered actionable feedback to improve further implementation of the IDT program. Ongoing efforts will further improve data entry, site onboarding procedures, and program communication.

Indexed as

implementation sciencemixed methodsprogram evaluationspeech-language pathologistsSwallowing

Identifiers

PMID36081831
PMCPMC9445514
OpenAlexW4294286377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.