Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081805›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Antifungal activity of non-conventional yeasts against

Evelyn Maluleke, Neil Paul Jolly, Hugh George Patterton, Mathabatha Evodia Setati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Use of Specific Non-Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Unveiling the shield: decoding UPSIDEFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Evelyn MalulekeDepartment of Viticulture and Oenology, South African Grape and Wine Research Institute, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa.
Neil Paul JollyPost Harvest and Agro-Processing Technologies, ARC Infruitec-Nietvoorbij (The Fruit, Vine and Wine Institute of the Agricultural Research Council), Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Hugh George PattertonCentre for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa.
Mathabatha Evodia SetatiDepartment of Viticulture and Oenology, South African Grape and Wine Research Institute, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZAInstitute for Deciduous Fruit, Vines and Wine · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grapes harbour a plethora of non-conventional yeast species. Over the past two decades, several of the species have been extensively characterised and their contribution to wine quality is better understood. Beyond fermentation, some of the species have been investigated for their potential as alternative biological tools to reduce grape and wine spoilage. However, such studies remain limited to a few genera. This work aimed to evaluate the antagonistic activity of grape must-derived non-conventional yeasts against

Indexed as

antagonistic yeastsbiological controlcell wall lytic enzymesvolatile organic compoundsWickerhamomyces anomalus

Identifiers

PMID36081805
PMCPMC9445577
OpenAlexW4292714705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.