Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081756›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2022

Preparing for Mental Health Act reform: Pilot study of co-produced implementation strategies for Advance Choice Documents.

Lucy A Stephenson, Tania Gergel, Alex Ruck Keene, Larry Rifkin, Gareth Owen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucy A StephensonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6888-3853
Tania GergelInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9155-8277
Alex Ruck Keene39 Essex Chambers, 81 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8856-8132
Larry RifkinSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gareth OwenInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AB, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5166-9332

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203376/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Advance Decision Making (ADM) is strongly supported by stakeholders but implementation remains challenging. In England and Wales, implementation strategies are urgently required to prepare for the introduction of mental health 'Advance Choice Documents' (ACDs) as part of Mental Health Act reforms. We report on a pilot project which aimed to co-produce and evaluate implementation strategies for ACDs with those who experience fluctuating mental capacity in the context of bipolar. Methods A co-produced prototype ACD template was piloted in 'Plan, Do, Study Act' (PDSA) cycles. Implementation strategies were co-produced with participants and mapped onto the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework. Strategies were evaluated during thematically analysed qualitative interviews. Results We piloted the template with 17 service users during 5 successive PDSA cycles and conducted 75 in depth interviews with stakeholders. Key strategies identified as accessible, appropriate and feasible were: interactive assistance from an independent 'supporter', a structured template and active offers of involvement to service users and informal carers. Conclusions Mental health professionals and organisations must prepare for increased expectations around mental health ADM. We recommend further pilot projects and the establishment of 'ACD workshops'. Resource is essential to fund independent 'supporters', training, network building and embedding ADM in clinical pathways.

Indexed as

advance choice documentAdvance directivebipolarco-productionimplementationmental capacitymental health actquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID36081756
PMCPMC9433915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.