Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081746›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2022

Normal C-reactive protein in active psoriatic arthritis: results from real-world clinical practice.

Chrysoula G Gialouri, Gerasimos Evangelatos, Maria Pappa, Anastasios Karamanakos, Alexios Iliopoulos, Maria G Tektonidou, Petros P Sfikakis, George E Fragoulis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chrysoula G GialouriJoint Academic Rheumatology Program, Rheumatology Unit, First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Gerasimos EvangelatosJoint Academic Rheumatology Program, Rheumatology Unit, First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Maria PappaJoint Academic Rheumatology Program, Rheumatology Unit, First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Anastasios KaramanakosJoint Academic Rheumatology Program, Rheumatology Unit, First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Alexios IliopoulosRheumatology Department, 417 Army Shared Fund Hospital NIMTS, Athens, Greece.
Maria G TektonidouJoint Academic Rheumatology Program, Rheumatology Unit, First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-0975
Petros P SfikakisJoint Academic Rheumatology Program, Rheumatology Unit, First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
George E FragoulisJoint Academic Rheumatology Program, Rheumatology Unit, First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias 75 Str, Athens 11527, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-7023
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRNIMTS Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The value of normal C-reactive protein (CRP) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is debatable. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that CRP is frequently normal in contemporary real-world PsA patients, despite active disease. Design: In this cross-sectional study, patients were divided into two groups: CRP ⩽ 0.5 mg/dl (normal) and CRP > 0.5 mg/dl (increased). Having as dependent variable the CRP status, these groups were compared for disease-related features, including composite disease activity indices [clinical Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) and minimal disease activity (MDA)] and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Agreement between CRP status and cDAPSA/MDA scores was calculated (Cohen's kappa). Methods: Data from consecutive PsA patients attending two outpatient rheumatology clinics (January 2019-June 2021) were analysed. Results: From 128 patients enrolled (51.6% females; mean ± standard deviation age: 53.4 ± 11.7 years; 23.4%, 48.4% and 64.1% treated with glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs, respectively), two-thirds (66.4%, Conclusion: Normal CRP in PsA should not be used as surrogate marker of remission or low/MDA, therefore needs to be interpreted with caution in clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

CRPDAPSAdisease activity indicesinflammatory markersminimal disease activitypsoriatic arthritis

Identifiers

PMID36081746
PMCPMC9445451
OpenAlexW4294577896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.