ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
Initial investigation of predicting hematoma expansion for intracerebral hemorrhage using imaging biomarkers and machine learning.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Predictive modeling of hematoma expansion from non-contrast computed tomography in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage patients.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most devastating types of strokes with mortality and morbidity rates ranging from about 51%-65% one year after diagnosis. Early hematoma expansion (HE) is a known cause of worsening neurological status of ICH patients. The goal of this study was to investigate whether non-contrast computed tomography imaging biomarkers (NCCT-IB) acquired at initial presentation can predict ICH growth in the acute stage. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected NCCT data from 200 patients with acute (<6 hours) ICH. Four NCCT-IBs (blending region, dark hole, island, and edema) were identified for each hematoma, respectively. HE status was recorded based on the clinical observation reported in the patient chart. Supervised machine learning models were developed, trained, and tested for 15 different input combinations of the NCCT-IBs to predict HE. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and probability for accurate diagnosis ( Results: The developed algorithm was able to predict expansion utilizing all four inputs with an accuracy of 70.17%. Further testing of all biomarker combinations yielded Conclusion: Specific attributes of ICHs may influence the likelihood of HE and can be evaluated via a machine learning algorithm. However, certain parameters may differ in importance to reach accurate conclusions about potential expansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.