Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081696›Full record

ArticleJSES international2022

Is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder.

Dimitris Dimitriou, Elin Winkler, Christoph Zindel, Florian Grubhofer, Karl Wieser, Samy Bouaicha

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06939530 (Comparision of Hydrodilatation Results at Different Volumes in Adhesive Capsulitis by Phases.), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06939530 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparision of Hydrodilatation Results at Different Volumes in Adhesive Capsulitis by Phases.

TypeinterventionalSponsorJavier Muñoz PazRan2025 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsCapsulitis of Shoulder, HydrodilatationArmsHydrodilatation (20 ml), Hydrodilatation (40 ml)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Shoulder pain: to image or not to image?Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dimitris DimitriouBalgrist University Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elin WinklerBalgrist University Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph ZindelBalgrist University Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Florian GrubhoferBalgrist University Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Karl WieserBalgrist University Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Samy BouaichaBalgrist University Hospital, Orthopaedic Department, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly performed in patients with frozen shoulder (FS). However, the necessity of MRI and its diagnostic value is questionable. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to clarify whether routine MRI could identify additional shoulder pathologies not previously suspected in the clinical examination and if any change in the treatment plan based on these additional MRI findings in FS patients was observed. Materials and methods: The medical records of all patients who presented in our outpatient clinic with a diagnosis of FS from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, the number of patients who received a shoulder MRI, changes in the diagnosis or identification of structural shoulder pathologies following MRI examination (if performed), as well as any alternation in the initially suggested treatment plan were recorded. Results: A total of 609 patients (male: 241, female: 368) diagnosed with an FS and an average age of 52 ± 10 (range: 18 to 81) years were identified. In 403 of the 609 patients (66%), a shoulder MRI was performed. An additional structural shoulder pathology was identified in 89 of 403 (22%) patients following the shoulder MRI, mostly rotator cuff tears (partial: 46/403 [11.4%], full-thickness: 30/403 [7.4%], rerupture following reconstruction: 10/403 [2.5%]) and labrum tears (3/403 [0.7%]). At minimum 2-year follow-up, 11 of 403 (2.7%) patients were treated surgically for the additional pathology identified on the MRI scan consisting of an arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction in 10 patients and a labrum refixation in one patient. Five of the 609 (0.8%) patients were treated for refractory FS by arthroscopic capsulotomy. Conclusions: Although additional pathologies were identified in 22% of the patients, a change in treatment plan due to the MRI findings was only observed in 2.7% (37 MRIs needed to identify 1 patient with FS requiring surgery for the additional MRI findings). Therefore, routine use of shoulder MRI scans in patients with FS but without suspicion of an additional pathology may not be indicated.

Indexed as

Adhesive capsulitisCost-effectivenessFrozen shoulderMRIRotator cuff tearsShoulder pain

Identifiers

PMID36081696
PMCPMC9446195
OpenAlexW4282589929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.