Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081648›Full record

ArticleHemaSphere2022

What Are the Attributes Prioritized in the Choice of Therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia? A Patient-physician Cross-matching Analysis of a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Luca Laurenti, Gianluca Gaidano, Francesca Romana Mauro, Stefano Molica, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Lydia Scarfò, Paolo Ghia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HemaSphere, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Luca LaurentiFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Gianluca GaidanoDivision of Hematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Francesca Romana MauroHematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Stefano MolicaDipartimento di Onco-Ematologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese Ciaccio, Catanzaro, Italy.
Patrizio PasqualettiSection of Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Sapienza Rome University, Rome, Italy.
Lydia ScarfòUniversità Vita Salute San Raffaele and Strategic Research Program on CLL, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
Paolo GhiaUniversità Vita Salute San Raffaele and Strategic Research Program on CLL, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Pugliese Ciaccio · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several treatment options are available for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and, for this reason, treatment choice can result challenging after introducing oral targeted agents. This study aims at comparing patients' and hematologists' preferences for attributes of CLL treatments. An online cross-sectional survey has been delivered to clinicians and patients affected by CLL in Italy. A discrete choice experiment has been conducted so to estimate each attribute's relative importance (RI) and assess the preference weight for each level of each attribute. An expert panel agreed on investigating the following attributes: progression-free survival (PFS) and measurable residual disease, route of administration/therapy duration and follow-up frequency, incidence of diarrhea (episodes/day), serious infections (grade 3 or 4), and atrial fibrillation. Overall, 746 patients and 109 clinicians accessed the survey, and 215 and 69, respectively, filled it in. The most important attributes were PFS (RI 30%) for hematologists and the risk of severe infections (RI 24%) for patients. Clinicians rated preference for maximum efficacy and lowest risk of severe infection very high (30%). Both patients and clinicians preferred oral administration while considering duration of therapy less relevant. The frequency of hospital appointments was negligible for patients, while clinicians preferred a quarterly frequency. Considering all attributes, diarrhea was weighted more by clinicians than by patients. Atrial fibrillation was not relevant for clinicians, while it was not negligible for patients. In conclusion, clinicians and patients favor an oral therapy, including continuous treatment, if associated with prolonged PFS, albeit with particular attention to the risk of serious infections.

Identifiers

PMID36081648
PMCPMC9436277
OpenAlexW4293792674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.