Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081647›Full record

ArticleRemote sensing2021

Comparison of Crop Trait Retrieval Strategies Using UAV-Based VNIR Hyperspectral Imaging.

Asmaa Abdelbaki, Martin Schlerf, Rebecca Retzlaff, Miriam Machwitz, Jochem Verrelst, Thomas Udelhoven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Remote sensing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A High-KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Asmaa AbdelbakiEnvironmental Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics Department, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3448-0415
Martin SchlerfEnvironmental Sensing and Modelling, Environmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3579-108X
Rebecca RetzlaffEnvironmental Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics Department, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7484-2655
Miriam MachwitzEnvironmental Sensing and Modelling, Environmental Research and Innovation Department, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Jochem VerrelstImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, Parc Cientific, 46980 Paterna, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-2081
Thomas UdelhovenEnvironmental Remote Sensing and Geoinformatics Department, Trier University, 54286 Trier, Germany.

Funding

European Research Council 755617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperspectral cameras onboard unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have recently emerged for monitoring crop traits at the sub-field scale. Different physical, statistical, and hybrid methods for crop trait retrieval have been developed. However, spectra collected from UAVs can be confounded by various issues, including illumination variation throughout the crop growing season, the effect of which on the retrieval performance is not well understood at present. In this study, four retrieval methods are compared, in terms of retrieving the leaf area index (LAI), fractional vegetation cover (fCover), and canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) of potato plants over an agricultural field for six dates during the growing season. We analyzed: (1) The standard look-up table method (LUTstd), (2) an improved (regularized) LUT method that involves variable correlation (LUTreg), (3) hybrid methods, and (4) random forest regression without (RF) and with (RFexp) the exposure time as an additional explanatory variable. The Soil-Leaf-Canopy (SLC) model was used in association with the LUT-based inversion and hybrid methods, while the statistical modelling methods (RF and RFexp) relied entirely on in situ data. The results revealed that RFexp was the best-performing method, yielding the highest accuracies, in terms of the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), for LAI (5.36%), fCover (5.87%), and CCC (15.01%). RFexp was able to reduce the effects of illumination variability and cloud shadows. LUTreg outperformed the other two retrieval methods (hybrid methods and LUTstd), with an NRMSE of 9.18% for LAI, 10.46% for fCover, and 12.16% for CCC. Conversely, LUTreg led to lower accuracies than those derived from RF for LAI (5.51%) and for fCover (6.23%), but not for CCC (16.21%). Therefore, the machine learning approaches-in particular, RF-appear to be the most promising retrieval methods for application to UAV-based hyperspectral data.

Indexed as

canopy chlorophyll contentfractional vegetation coverhybrid methodleaf area indexLUT-based inversionstatistical method

Identifiers

PMID36081647
PMCPMC7613394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.