Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081572›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2022

Natural Baicalein-Rich Fraction as Radiosensitizer in Combination with Bismuth Oxide Nanoparticles and Cisplatin for Clinical Radiotherapy.

Noor Nabilah Talik Sisin, Nor Fazila Che Mat, Raizulnasuha Ab Rashid, Norhayati Dollah, Khairunisak Abdul Razak, Moshi Geso, Merfat Algethami, Wan Nordiana Rahman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Targeting the organelle for radiosensitization in cancer radiotherapy.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Noor Nabilah Talik SisinSchool of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-1054-6173
Nor Fazila Che MatSchool of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-1698-3633
Raizulnasuha Ab RashidSchool of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9482-4531
Norhayati DollahDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Khairunisak Abdul RazakSchool of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0140-2418
Moshi GesoSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3780-2176
Merfat AlgethamiFaculty of Science, Taif University, Al Hawiyah, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Wan Nordiana RahmanSchool of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-8386-0329
Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYHospital Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYRMIT University · AUTaif University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Chemotherapy has been used in conjunction with radiation therapy to improve the treatment outcomes of cancers. Cisplatin (Cis) is a standard treatment that has been used as a chemotherapeutic drug in medical settings. However, the possibility of complications constrains the treatment due to the exposure of healthy organs to unnecessary radiation and the drugs' toxicities. As a result, researchers have been looking for non-toxic chemotherapeutic agents which can be used as radiosensitizers, possibly produced from natural derivatives and nano sized materials. Methods: BRF, Cis, and BiONPs were irradiated individually and in combinations with 6 MV of photon beam and 6 MeV of electron beams with 0 to 10 Gy radiation doses on MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and NIH/3T3 cell lines. Then, the experimental sensitization enhancement ratios (SER) of each treatment obtained were compared to the theoretical dose enhancement factor (DEF). The interactions within the BRF-BiONPs (BB) and BRF-Cis-BiONPs (BCB) combinations were also estimated using the Combination Index (CI). Results: BRF induced radiosensitization in all cells under 6 MV photon beam (SER of 1.06 to 1.35), and MDA-MB-231 cells only under 6 MeV electron beam (SER = 1.20). The highest SER values for BiONPs and Cis were obtained from MCF-7 cells under a 6 MeV electron beam (SER of 1.50 and 2.24, respectively). The theoretical DEFs were generally lower than the experimental SERs. Based on the SER and CI relationships, it was estimated that BB and BCB therapy methods interacted in either a synergistic or additive manner. Conclusion: The BRF is found to induce relatively less radiosensitization effects compared to the BiONPs and Cis. The BB and BCB combinations have shown better effects with potential for becoming competently suitable radiosensitizers in breast cancer therapies.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsBismuthCisplatinFlavanonesHumansRadiotherapybaicaleinBismuthbismuth oxideCisplatinFlavanonesRadiation-Sensitizing Agentsbaicaleinbismuth oxidecisplatinnanoparticlesradiosensitizationsynergism

Identifiers

PMID36081572
PMCPMC9448000
OpenAlexW4294204310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.