ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Clinical impact of inferior mesenteric vein preservation during left hemicolectomy with low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery for distal transverse and descending colon cancers: A comparative study based on computed tomography.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional vascular preservation during laparoscopic segmental left colectomy - Selective arterial ligation with preservation of the inferior mesenteric vein-A video vignette.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- Safety of carbon-ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer after rectal surgery: a single-institution retrospective study.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with inferior mesenteric vein sparing: a step-by-step surgical approach (with video).Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026Article
- Preoperative CT Evaluation of Abdominal Vasculature and the Risk of Surgical Complications in Colorectal Cancer Resection with Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with articulated forceps for colocutaneous fistulizing Crohn disease.Annals of coloproctology · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Ischemic Colitis after Laparoscopic Partial Resection of the Descending Colon: Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Robotic selective left colectomy with inferior mesenteric artery and inferior mesenteric vein preservation: a stepwise video technique.Annals of coloproctology · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic Oncologic Splenic Flexure Resection: A Complete Mesocolic Excision with Concomitant Inferior Mesenteric Artery and Vein Preservation.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- The Atlas of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery and Vein under Maximum-Intensity Projection and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction View.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Congestive ischemic colitis successfully treated with anti-inflammatory therapy: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Presence of a long remnant sigmoid colon after left hemicolectomy with inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) ligation for distal transverse and descending colon cancers may be a risk factor for venous ischemia. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of IMV preservation in patients who underwent left hemicolectomy with inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) preservation. Methods: We included 155 patients who underwent left hemicolectomy with IMA preservation for distal transverse and descending colon cancers from 2003 to 2020. Technical success of IMV preservation was determined by assessing pre- and post-operative patency of the IMV on computed tomography (CT) by an abdominal radiologist. Intestinal complications comprising ulceration, stricture, venous engorgement, and colitis in remnant colon were compared between the IMV preservation and ligation groups. Results: IMV was preserved in 22 (14.2%) and ligated in 133 (85.8%) patients. Surgical time, postoperative recovery outcomes, and number of harvested lymph nodes were similar in both groups. The technical success of IMV preservation was 81.8%. Intestinal complications were less common in the preservation group than in the IMV ligation group (4.5% vs. 23.3%, P=0.048). The complications in the IMV ligation group were anastomotic ulcer (n=2), anastomotic stricture (n=4), venous engorgement of the remnant distal colon (n=4), and colitis in the distal colon (n=21). Conclusions: IMV preservation may be beneficial after left hemicolectomy with IMA preservation for distal transverse and descending colon cancers. We suggest that IMV preservation might be considered when long remnant sigmoid colon is expected during left hemicolectomy with low ligation of IMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.