Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081518›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

A score of DNA damage repair pathway with the predictive ability for chemotherapy and immunotherapy is strongly associated with immune signaling pathway in pan-cancer.

Ke Ding, Youhua He, Jinfen Wei, Shuying Fu, Jiajian Wang, Zixi Chen, Haibo Zhang, Yimo Qu, Keying Liang, Xiaocheng Gong and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ke DingSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Youhua HeSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Jinfen WeiSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Shuying FuCollege of Life Science, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing, China.
Jiajian WangClinical Laboratory Department of Longgang District People's Hospital of Shenzhen & The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.
Zixi ChenSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Haibo ZhangSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Yimo QuSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Keying LiangSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaocheng GongSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Li QiuSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Dong ChenFangrui Institute of Innovative Drugs, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Botao XiaoSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Hongli DuSchool of Biology and Biological Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage repair (DDR) is critical in maintaining normal cellular function and genome integrity and is associated with cancer risk, progression, and therapeutic response. However, there is still a lack of a thorough understanding of the effects of DDR genes' expression level in cancer progression and therapeutic resistance. Therefore, we defined a tumor-related DDR score (TR-DDR score), utilizing the expression levels of 20 genes, to quantify the tumor signature of DNA damage repair pathways in tumors and explore the possible function and mechanism for the score among different cancers. The TR-DDR score has remarkably predictive power for tumor tissues. It is a more accurate indicator for the response of chemotherapy or immunotherapy combined with the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) and G2M checkpoint score than the pre-existing predictors (CD8 or PD-L1). This study points out that the TR-DDR score generally has positive correlations with patients of advanced-stage, genome-instability, and cell proliferation signature, while negative correlations with inflammatory response, apoptosis, and p53 pathway signature. In the context of tumor immune response, the TR-DDR score strongly positively correlates with the number of T cells (CD4+ activated memory cells, CD8+ cells, T regs, Tfh) and macrophages M1 polarization. In addition, by difference analysis and correlation analysis,

Indexed as

DNA DamageNeoplasmsDNA RepairHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapySignal TransductionImmunologic FactorsDNA damage repair (DDR)genomic instabilitypan-cancertherapeutic sensitivitytumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID36081518
PMCPMC9445361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.