Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081493›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Use of Automated Infrared Pupillometry to Predict Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Observational Study.

Saiko Okamoto, Mihoko Ishizawa, Satoki Inoue, Hideaki Sakuramoto

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06187792 (Constructing a Model of Pupillary Parameters in Predicting Delirium Among Critically Ill Patients in the Intensive Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06187792 unknown statusnot on this map

Constructing a Model of Pupillary Parameters in Predicting Delirium Among Critically Ill Patients in the Intensive Unit

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsICU Delirium
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Saiko OkamotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7716-8392
Mihoko IshizawaDepartment of Adult Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Satoki InoueDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima, Japan.
Hideaki SakuramotoDepartment of Critical Care and Disaster Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyusyu International College of Nursing, Fukuoka, Japan.
Fukushima Medical University Hospital · JPHitachi General Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing · JPNara Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Delirium is an acute state of brain dysfunction prevalent among critically ill patients. Disturbances in the sympathetic neurons, including cholinergic neurons, have been reported to cause delirium by upsetting the balance of neurotransmitter synthesis, release, and inactivation. The cholinergic system mediates pupillary constriction as a response to light stimulation, and this reflex can be measured using automated infrared pupillometry (AIP). The relationship between delirium and AIP parameters has been examined. The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM ICU) and the Intensive Care Unit Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) are used for assessing delirium. However, that between the ICDSC score and AIP parameters remains unclear. Objective: To examine the relationship between AIP parameters and the various categories of delirium as defined by the ICDSC score (delirium, subsyndromal delirium, no delirium). Methods: This prospective observational study included patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from May 2018 to September 2018. ICU patients were classified into delirium, subsyndromal delirium, and no delirium groups according to the ICDSC score during ICU stay. The pupillary light reflex was assessed in both eyes immediately after admission using AIP with a portable infrared pupillometer. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the odds ratio to examine the relationship between the severity of delirium as assessed by the ICDSC score and the AIP parameters. Results: In total 133 patients were included in the study. Based on the ICDSC scores, 41.4% of patients had no delirium, 40.6% had subsyndromal delirium, and 18% had delirium. Dilation velocity (DV) measured by AIP was significantly different among the delirium, subsyndromal delirium, and no delirium groups. Post-hoc comparisons showed that DV was significantly slower in the delirium group than in the no delirium group but was not significantly different between the subsyndromal delirium and no delirium groups. After adjusting for patients' sex and age at enrollment, DV was shown to be independently associated with delirium. Conclusion: This study suggests that the use of AIP at ICU admission may improve the identification of patients at a high risk of developing delirium.

Indexed as

automated infrared pupillometrydeliriumdilation velocityintensive care delirium screening checklistsubsyndromal delirium

Identifiers

PMID36081493
PMCPMC9445463
OpenAlexW4294265984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.