Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081462›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Remote training as a common tool for the different professionals involved in the acute phase after terror attacks across Europe: Perspectives from an expert panel.

Florence Askenazy, Arnaud Fernandez, Levent Altan, Michèle Battista, Michel Dückers, Morgane Gindt, Ophélie Nachon, Aleksandra Ivankovic, Ingeborg Porcar-Becker, Nathalie Prieto and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Florence AskenazyCognition Behaviour Technology (CoBTeK) Lab, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Arnaud FernandezCognition Behaviour Technology (CoBTeK) Lab, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Levent AltanVictim Support Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
Michèle BattistaUniversity Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Children's Hospitals of Nice CHU-Lenval, Nice, France.
Michel DückersARQ Centre of Expertise for the Impact of Disasters and Crises, Diemen, Netherlands.
Morgane GindtCognition Behaviour Technology (CoBTeK) Lab, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Ophélie NachonCognition Behaviour Technology (CoBTeK) Lab, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Aleksandra IvankovicVictim Support Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
Ingeborg Porcar-BeckerUnit for Trauma, Crisis and Conflicts at the Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
Nathalie PrietoCellule d'Urgence Médico-Psychologique, Centre Régional du Psychotraumatisme, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
Philippe RobertCognition Behaviour Technology (CoBTeK) Lab, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Lise Eilin SteneNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS), Oslo, Norway.
Susanne ThummlerCognition Behaviour Technology (CoBTeK) Lab, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Valeria ManeraCognition Behaviour Technology (CoBTeK) Lab, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRFondation Lenval · FRAssociation France Alzheimer · FRCognition Behaviour Technology · FRHôpital Edouard Herriot · FRNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies · NOUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acute response after a terror attack may have a crucial impact on the physical and psychological wellbeing of the victims. Preparedness of the professionals involved in the acute response is a key element to ensure effective interventions, and can be improved through trainings. Today in Europe there is a recognized lack of inter-professional and international trainings, which are important, among others, to respond to the needs and the rights of victims affected by a terrorist attack in another country than their home country. In this paper we report the perspectives of an expert panel composed by different categories of professionals on the possible role of interprofessional trainings provided remotely. The experts discussed the pertinence of remote trainings for professionals involved in the acute response of a terror attack, and highlighted their Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT analysis). We concluded that, while remote trainings cannot replace in-person trainings, they may be useful to share knowledge about the role and the organization of the different categories of professionals, thus potentially improving response coordination, and to easily share good practices across professionals and countries.

Indexed as

acute response phaseinformation and communication technologiesremote trainingSWOT analysisterror attack

Identifiers

PMID36081462
PMCPMC9445156
OpenAlexW4292834581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.