Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081459›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Validation of reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the active-empathic listening scale.

Hang Guo, Lemin Lin, Ziming Jia, Jiaying Sun, Zisen Zhuang, Lisa Duan, Jiangnan Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese CancerSupportSourceHealth and quality of life outcomes · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hang GuoPostgraduate Group, Logistics University of People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin, China.
Lemin LinPostgraduate Group, Logistics University of People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin, China.
Ziming JiaThe Health Team of the Fifth Mobile Detachment of the First Mobile Corps of the Armed Police Force, Dingzhou, China.
Jiaying SunCollege of Field Engineering, Army Engineering University of People's Liberation Army of China, Nanjing, China.
Zisen ZhuangDepartment of Psychology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Lisa DuanInstitute for Military Psychological Efficacy Evaluation and Stress Intervention, Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin, China.
Jiangnan SunDepartment of Psychology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Active-empathic listening (AEL) is the active and emotional involvement of a listener that can take place in at least three key stages of the listening process. Bodie has developed and validated a self-reported, 11-item, three-factor active-empathic listening scale (AELS) in English with good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86) to assess AEL abilities. Nevertheless, a Chinese version of the AELS had not been established and validated yet. Objective: The objective of the present study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the AELS. Methods: After translating the scale into the Chinese version, 834 college students completed the test. After 4 weeks, 206 participants were tested again on the Chinese AELS to examine retest reliability. The critical ratio method and the item-total correlations were used for the item analysis. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed to examine the construct validity. The internal consistency of the scale was analyzed with Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to examine the scale's retest reliability. The Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) was used to examine the convergent validity. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted. Results: Each item of the Chinese AELS had a good discrimination, and the item-total correlation of each item ranged from 0.51 to 0.73. EFA extracted three factors with characteristic root values greater than 1, which could explain 70.72% of the total variance. CFA indicated an adequate fit of the three-factor model (χ Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the Chinese AELS met the basic psychometrics requirements. Therefore, the scale can be potentially used to assess the active empathic listening abilities of people in China.

Indexed as

active-empathic listening scale (AELS)active listeningChinese versionreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID36081459
PMCPMC9445210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.