Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081411›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022

Benefits of Meniscal Repair in Selected Patients Aged 60 Years and Older.

Martin Husen, Nicholas I Kennedy, Sara Till, Anna Reinholz, Michael J Stuart, Aaron J Krych, Daniel B F Saris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Risk Factors for Failure of Meniscal Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Annual trends in arthroscopic meniscal surgery in Japan: 10-year analysis from 2014 to 2023.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Redefining Failure: Criteria for Unsuccessful Outcomes in Meniscus Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Long-Term Results for Meniscus Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Management of Horizontal Cleavage Meniscus Tears.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin HusenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Nicholas I KennedyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Sara TillDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Anna ReinholzDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Michael J StuartDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Aaron J KrychDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Daniel B F SarisDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Musculoskeletal Research Training ProgramT32AR056950 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Jennifer J Westendorf · 2009 to 2026
$7.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR056950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the benefits and outcomes of meniscal repair in patients older than 60 years. Purpose: To (1) report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of meniscal repair in patients aged ≥60 years and compare them with matched patients who underwent meniscectomy and (2) identify procedural failures. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: We included 32 knees in 32 patients aged ≥60 years (20 female, 12 male; mean age, 64.5 ± 4.6 years) who underwent meniscal repair surgery at a single medical institution between 2010 and 2020. Patients were matched according to age, sex, body mass index, and meniscal tear type with a comparison cohort who underwent meniscectomy (n = 49 patients [49 knees]; 32 female, 17 male). For all patients, demographic information, clinical history, physical examination findings, treatment details, and radiographic images were reviewed and analyzed. At final follow-up (mean, 42.2 months; range, 13-128 months), patients completed the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm score. Clinical failure was defined as revision surgery and/or progression to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A matched-pairs Results: The majority of patients had a medial meniscal tear (72.8%), whereas the lateral meniscus was torn in 27.2% of cases. Most tears were located in the meniscal root (56.8%), followed by the posterior horn (34.6%) and midbody (8.6%). At final follow-up, all outcome scores were higher in the repair group compared with the meniscectomy group (IKDC, 78.9 ± 13.4 vs 56.0 ± 15.4; KOOS, 86.6 ± 11.9 vs 61.7 ± 16.2; Lysholm, 88.3 ± 13.3 vs 68.7 ± 15.2, respectively; Conclusion: All clinical outcome scores were higher in the meniscal repair group compared with the matched meniscectomy group at final follow-up. The clinical failure rate of the repair group was 22%. These findings support meniscal repair in selected patients aged ≥60 years.

Indexed as

meniscal repairmeniscal tearmeniscectomyolder patientsroot tear

Identifiers

PMID36081411
PMCPMC9445464
OpenAlexW4294043687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.