ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022
Benefits of Meniscal Repair in Selected Patients Aged 60 Years and Older.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Osteoarthritis Development Following Meniscectomy vs. Meniscal Repair for Posterior Medial Meniscus Injuries: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes of meniscal repair using bone marrow aspirate-derived fibrin clot: A comparison of tears with and without meniscal cysts.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Not all meniscal repair failures are equal: A comparison between early and late failure risk factors.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Failure of Meniscal Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Rethinking meniscal repair in patients over 40: Extending the boundaries of joint preservation.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Complications and Reoperations Following Meniscal Repair and Transplantation.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Annual trends in arthroscopic meniscal surgery in Japan: 10-year analysis from 2014 to 2023.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026Article
- Repair of Isolated Lateral Meniscal Injuries Yields Comparable Clinical Outcomes in Young and Middle-Aged Patients.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Redefining Failure: Criteria for Unsuccessful Outcomes in Meniscus Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Long-Term Results for Meniscus Repair.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- No differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) and complications after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstrings (HT) in patients aged 50 or older.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Management of Horizontal Cleavage Meniscus Tears.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- Outcomes After Isolated Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repairs Using an Anatomic Transtibial Pullout Technique in Patients Older Than 60 Years: A Matched Cohort Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Novel approach to meniscal vascularity evaluation using indocyanine green fluorescence-guided knee arthroscopy.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2025Article
- Meniscus Ripstop Stitches: A Useful Technique for Arthroscopic Repair of Challenging Radial Tears of the Meniscus.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Predictors of Postoperative Outcomes after Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy: A Retrospective Analysis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Indocyanine Green Fluorescence-Guided Knee Arthroscopy: A Technical Note for Investigating the Microvasculature Around the Meniscus.Arthroscopy techniques · 2024Article
- Outcomes of Meniscal Repair in Patients Aged 40 and Above: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the benefits and outcomes of meniscal repair in patients older than 60 years. Purpose: To (1) report the clinical and radiographic outcomes of meniscal repair in patients aged ≥60 years and compare them with matched patients who underwent meniscectomy and (2) identify procedural failures. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: We included 32 knees in 32 patients aged ≥60 years (20 female, 12 male; mean age, 64.5 ± 4.6 years) who underwent meniscal repair surgery at a single medical institution between 2010 and 2020. Patients were matched according to age, sex, body mass index, and meniscal tear type with a comparison cohort who underwent meniscectomy (n = 49 patients [49 knees]; 32 female, 17 male). For all patients, demographic information, clinical history, physical examination findings, treatment details, and radiographic images were reviewed and analyzed. At final follow-up (mean, 42.2 months; range, 13-128 months), patients completed the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm score. Clinical failure was defined as revision surgery and/or progression to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A matched-pairs Results: The majority of patients had a medial meniscal tear (72.8%), whereas the lateral meniscus was torn in 27.2% of cases. Most tears were located in the meniscal root (56.8%), followed by the posterior horn (34.6%) and midbody (8.6%). At final follow-up, all outcome scores were higher in the repair group compared with the meniscectomy group (IKDC, 78.9 ± 13.4 vs 56.0 ± 15.4; KOOS, 86.6 ± 11.9 vs 61.7 ± 16.2; Lysholm, 88.3 ± 13.3 vs 68.7 ± 15.2, respectively; Conclusion: All clinical outcome scores were higher in the meniscal repair group compared with the matched meniscectomy group at final follow-up. The clinical failure rate of the repair group was 22%. These findings support meniscal repair in selected patients aged ≥60 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.