Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081406›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2022

Perceptions on Oral Care Needs, Barriers, and Practices Among Managers and Staff in Long-Term Care Settings for Older People in Flanders, Belgium: A Cross-sectional Survey.

Ellen Palmers, Lynn Janssens, Inès Phlypo, Kris Vanhaecht, Johanna De Almeida Mello, Luc De Visschere, Dominique Declerck, Joke Duyck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ellen PalmersDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lynn JanssensDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Inès PhlypoDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Kris VanhaechtDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johanna De Almeida MelloDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1262-318X
Luc De VisschereDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Dominique DeclerckDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Joke DuyckDepartment of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to explore oral health perception and oral care needs, barriers, and current practices as perceived by managers and staff in long-term care organizations for older people in Flanders. Research Design and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study where 2 questionnaires were developed, one for managers and one for caregivers, and were validated in Flemish long-term care organizations. Descriptive analyses and multivariable generalized linear models evaluated the main outcomes and their associations with determinants such as the size of the organization, the presence of an oral health policy, collaboration with a dentist, among others. Results: A total of 145 managers and 197 caregivers completed the questionnaire. More than 50% of caregivers and managers perceived their residents' oral health as mediocre to good. Collaboration with a dentist ( Discussion and Implications: The results emphasize that collaborating with a dentist and the presence of an oral health policy in care organizations are important for a positive perception of the oral health of the residents and for the adoption of guidelines by caregivers and managers. In addition, training on handling care refusal should be included in the overall training. These results are crucial input for the development of a methodology for implementing a structured oral care policy in long-term care facilities.

Indexed as

BarriersCaregiving—formalNeeds-assessmentNursing homesOral health

Identifiers

PMID36081406
PMCPMC9447852
OpenAlexW4289638386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.