Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081311›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2022

Collection and Utilization of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in a Colorectal Surgery Clinic.

Noah J Harrison, Andrea A Lopez, Megan M Shroder, Justin M Bachmann, Emily Burnell, Michael B Hopkins, Timothy M Geiger, Alexander T Hawkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integrating real-time patient-reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care: development and evaluation of a concise clinical scorecard.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Noah J HarrisonVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Andrea A LopezVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
Megan M ShroderDivision of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee.
Justin M BachmannMedicine Service, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System; Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Emily BurnellVanderbilt University Medical Center, Population Health, Nashville, Tennessee.
Michael B HopkinsDivision of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee.
Timothy M GeigerDivision of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee.
Alexander T HawkinsDivision of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Nashville, Tennessee. Electronic address: alex.hawkins@vumc.org.

Funding

Novel Assessment of the Role of Surgery in Recurrent DiverticulitisK23DK118192 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HAWKINS, ALEXANDER THARRINGTON · 2018 to 2022
$788k
Development of a Tailored Intervention to Increase Veteran Enrollment in Cardiac RehabilitationIK2HX003021 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI BACHMANN, JUSTIN M · 2021 to 2025
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX003021NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK118192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe routine collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) promises to improve patient care. However, in colorectal surgery, PROMs are uncommonly collected outside of clinical research studies and rarely used in clinical care. We designed and implemented a quality improvement project with the goals of routinely collecting PROMs and increasing the frequency that PROMs are utilized by colorectal surgeons in clinical practice.

methodsThis mixed-methods, quality improvement project was conducted in the colorectal surgery clinic of a tertiary academic medical center. Patients were administered up to five PROMs before each appointment. PROM completion rates were measured. Additionally, we performed two educational interventions to increase utilization of our electronic health record's PROM dashboard by colorectal surgeons. Utilization rates and attitudes toward the PROM dashboard were measured.

resultsOverall, patients completed 3600 of 3977 (90.9%) administered PROMs during the study period. At baseline, colorectal surgeons reviewed 6.7% of completed PROMs. After two educational interventions, this increased to 39.3% (P = 0.004). Colorectal surgeons also felt that the PROM dashboard was easier to use. Barriers to greater PROM dashboard utilization included poor user interface/user experience and a perceived lack of knowledge, time, and relevance.

conclusionsThe collection of PROMs in colorectal surgery clinics is feasible and can result in high PROM completion rates. Educational interventions can improve the utilization of PROMs by colorectal surgeons in clinical practice. Our experience collecting PROMs through this quality improvement initiative can serve as a template for other colorectal surgery clinics interested in collecting and utilizing data from PROMs.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsColorectal SurgeryHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality ImprovementColorectal cancerDiverticulitisInflammatory bowel diseasePatient-reported outcome measuresQuality improvementQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID36081311
PMCPMC9588722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.