ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
An Anonymous Authentication and Key Update Mechanism for IoT Devices Based on EnOcean Protocol.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
EnOcean, a commonly used control protocol in smart lighting systems, provides authentication, as well as message integrity verification services, and can resist replay attack and tamper attack. However, since the device identity information transmitted between sensors in smart lighting control systems is easily accessible by malicious attackers, attackers can analyze users' habits based on the intercepted information. This paper analyzed the security of the EnOcean protocol using a formal analysis method based on the colored Petri net (CPN) theory and the Dolev-Yao attacker model and found that the protocol did not anonymize the device identity information and did not have a communication key update mechanism, so an attacker could easily initiate a key compromise impersonation attack (KCIA) after breaking the pre-shared communication key. To address the above security issues, this paper proposed an EnOcean-A protocol with higher security based on the EnOcean protocol. The EnOcean-A protocol introduced a trusted third-party server to send communication keys to communication devices because devices must obtain different communication keys from the trusted third-party server each time they communicated. Thus, this protocol could resist a KCIA and achieve forward security. Meanwhile, the device identity information was anonymized using a homomorphic hash function in the EnOcean-A protocol, and the dynamic update mechanism of the device identity information was added so that an attacker could not obtain the real identity information of the device. Finally, the formal analysis of the EnOcean-A protocol showed that the new protocol could resist a KCIA and ensure the anonymity and untraceability of the communication device, which had higher security compared with the EnOcean protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.