ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
UAV-Based Hyperspectral Monitoring Using Push-Broom and Snapshot Sensors: A Multisite Assessment for Precision Viticulture Applications.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review on the Advancements in Remote Sensing and Proximity Tools for Grapevine Disease Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Pooled it
- Hyperspectral imaging-based early stress and disease detection for sustainable crop management.Planta · 2026Review
- Adaptive multi-scale feature refinement for wheat phenology recognition using cross-scale attention mechanisms.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Development of a Multispectral Image Database in Visible-Near-Infrared for Demosaicking and Machine Learning Applications.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Micronutrient Biofortification in Wheat: QTLs, Candidate Genes and Molecular Mechanism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Hyperspectral Imaging for High Throughput Optical Spectroscopy of pL Droplets.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Quality assurance of hyperspectral imaging systems for neural network supported plant phenotyping.Plant methods · 2024Article
- Advancements in Hyperspectral Imaging and Computer-Aided Diagnostic Methods for the Enhanced Detection and Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancer.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- RGB Imaging as a Tool for Remote Sensing of Characteristics of Terrestrial Plants: A Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Acceleration of Hyperspectral Skin Cancer Image Classification through Parallel Machine-Learning Methods.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Real-Time AI-Assisted Push-Broom Hyperspectral System for Precision Agriculture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advances in viticultureFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Combining features selection strategy and features fusion strategy for SPAD estimation of winter wheat based on UAV multispectral imagery.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- A Novel Correction Methodology to Improve the Performance of a Low-Cost Hyperspectral Portable Snapshot Camera.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An Inexpensive Unmanned Aerial Vehicle-Based Tool for Mobile Network Output Analysis and Visualization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperspectral aerial imagery is becoming increasingly available due to both technology evolution and a somewhat affordable price tag. However, selecting a proper UAV + hyperspectral sensor combo to use in specific contexts is still challenging and lacks proper documental support. While selecting an UAV is more straightforward as it mostly relates with sensor compatibility, autonomy, reliability and cost, a hyperspectral sensor has much more to be considered. This note provides an assessment of two hyperspectral sensors (push-broom and snapshot) regarding practicality and suitability, within a precision viticulture context. The aim is to provide researchers, agronomists, winegrowers and UAV pilots with dependable data collection protocols and methods, enabling them to achieve faster processing techniques and helping to integrate multiple data sources. Furthermore, both the benefits and drawbacks of using each technology within a precision viticulture context are also highlighted. Hyperspectral sensors, UAVs, flight operations, and the processing methodology for each imaging type' datasets are presented through a qualitative and quantitative analysis. For this purpose, four vineyards in two countries were selected as case studies. This supports the extrapolation of both advantages and issues related with the two types of hyperspectral sensors used, in different contexts. Sensors' performance was compared through the evaluation of field operations complexity, processing time and qualitative accuracy of the results, namely the quality of the generated hyperspectral mosaics. The results shown an overall excellent geometrical quality, with no distortions or overlapping faults for both technologies, using the proposed mosaicking process and reconstruction. By resorting to the multi-site assessment, the qualitative and quantitative exchange of information throughout the UAV hyperspectral community is facilitated. In addition, all the major benefits and drawbacks of each hyperspectral sensor regarding its operation and data features are identified. Lastly, the operational complexity in the context of precision agriculture is also presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.