ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Comparison of Eye and Face Features on Drowsiness Analysis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drowsiness is one of the leading causes of traffic accidents. For those who operate large machinery or motor vehicles, incidents due to lack of sleep can cause property damage and sometimes lead to grave consequences of injuries and fatality. This study aims to design learning models to recognize drowsiness through human facial features. In addition, this work analyzes the attentions of individual neurons in the learning model to understand how neural networks interpret drowsiness. For this analysis, gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) is implemented in the neural networks to display the attention of neurons. The eye and face images are processed separately to the model for the training process. The results initially show that better results can be obtained by delivering eye images alone. The effect of Grad-CAM is also more reasonable using eye images alone. Furthermore, this work proposed a feature analysis method, K-nearest neighbors Sigma (KNN-Sigma), to estimate the homogeneous concentration and heterogeneous separation of the extracted features. In the end, we found that the fusion of face and eye signals gave the best results for recognition accuracy and KNN-sigma. The area under the curve (AUC) of using face, eye, and fusion images are 0.814, 0.897, and 0.935, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.