ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Machine Learning and Lexicon Approach to Texts Processing in the Detection of Degrees of Toxicity in Online Discussions.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sensors Data Processing Using Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Detection of emotion by text analysis using machine learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Pashto offensive language detection: a benchmark dataset and monolingual Pashto BERT.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Deep Learning in the Detection of Disinformation about COVID-19 in Online Space.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article focuses on the problem of detecting toxicity in online discussions. Toxicity is currently a serious problem when people are largely influenced by opinions on social networks. We offer a solution based on classification models using machine learning methods to classify short texts on social networks into multiple degrees of toxicity. The classification models used both classic methods of machine learning, such as naïve Bayes and SVM (support vector machine) as well ensemble methods, such as bagging and RF (random forest). The models were created using text data, which we extracted from social networks in the Slovak language. The labelling of our dataset of short texts into multiple classes-the degrees of toxicity-was provided automatically by our method based on the lexicon approach to texts processing. This lexicon method required creating a dictionary of toxic words in the Slovak language, which is another contribution of the work. Finally, an application was created based on the learned machine learning models, which can be used to detect the degree of toxicity of new social network comments as well as for experimentation with various machine learning methods. We achieved the best results using an SVM-average value of accuracy = 0.89 and F1 = 0.79. This model also outperformed the ensemble learning by the RF and Bagging methods; however, the ensemble learning methods achieved better results than the naïve Bayes method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.