Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36080891›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Generative Adversarial Networks and Data Clustering for Likable Drone Design.

Lee J Yamin, Jessica R Cauchard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lee J YaminMagic Lab, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-9380-1824
Jessica R CauchardMagic Lab, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva 8410501, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8916-8787

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel applications for human-drone interaction demand new design approaches, such as social drones that need to be perceived as likable by users. However, given the complexity of the likability perception process, gathering such design information from the interaction context is intricate. This work leverages deep learning-based techniques to generate novel likable drone images. We collected a drone image database (N=360) applicable for design research and assessed the drone's likability ratings in a user study (N=379). We employed two clustering methodologies: 1. likability-based, which resulted in non-likable, neutral, and likable drone clusters; and 2. feature-based (VGG, PCA), which resulted in drone clusters characterized by visual similarity; both clustered using the K-means algorithm. A characterization process identified three drone features: colorfulness, animal-like representation, and emotional expressions through facial features, which affect drone likability, going beyond prior research. We used the likable drone cluster (N=122) for generating new images using StyleGAN2-ADA and addressed the dataset size limitation using specific configurations and transfer learning. Our results were mitigated due to the dataset size; thus, we illustrate the feasibility of our approach by generating new images using the original database. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) exploitation for drone design, and to the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to suggest GANs for such application.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsUnmanned Aerial DevicesCluster AnalysisHumansdata clusteringdeep learningdrone designgenerative adversarial networkshuman-drone interaction

Identifiers

PMID36080891
PMCPMC9459981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.