ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Deep Learning-Based Subtask Segmentation of Timed Up-and-Go Test Using RGB-D Cameras.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Physics-Data Hybrid Framework Using Uncalibrated Consumer CMOS Vision: Pilot Study on Monocular Automatic TUG Assessment Towards Early Parkinson's Disease Risk Screening.Micromachines · 2026Article
- The Effects of Clinical Applications of Robot-Assisted Therapy Methods: End-Effector, Fixed Exoskeleton, and Wearable Exoskeleton on Functional Activities in Stroke Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validation of a markerless motion capture app for automated scoring of sit-to-stand, timed up and go, and short physical performance battery tests in adults with chronic disease.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Development of a Biomechanical Device for Parameter Quantification Associated with the Sit-to-Stand Movement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The timed up-and-go (TUG) test is an efficient way to evaluate an individual's basic functional mobility, such as standing up, walking, turning around, and sitting back. The total completion time of the TUG test is a metric indicating an individual's overall mobility. Moreover, the fine-grained consumption time of the individual subtasks in the TUG test may provide important clinical information, such as elapsed time and speed of each TUG subtask, which may not only assist professionals in clinical interventions but also distinguish the functional recovery of patients. To perform more accurate, efficient, robust, and objective tests, this paper proposes a novel deep learning-based subtask segmentation of the TUG test using a dilated temporal convolutional network with a single RGB-D camera. Evaluation with three different subject groups (healthy young, healthy adult, stroke patients) showed that the proposed method demonstrated better generality and achieved a significantly higher and more robust performance (healthy young = 95.458%, healthy adult = 94.525%, stroke = 93.578%) than the existing rule-based and artificial neural network-based subtask segmentation methods. Additionally, the results indicated that the input from the pelvis alone achieved the best accuracy among many other single inputs or combinations of inputs, which allows a real-time inference (approximately 15 Hz) in edge devices, such as smartphones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.