Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36080780›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Systematic Literature Review on Visual Analytics of Predictive Maintenance in the Manufacturing Industry.

Xiang Cheng, Jun Kit Chaw, Kam Meng Goh, Tin Tin Ting, Shafrida Sahrani, Mohammad Nazir Ahmad, Rabiah Abdul Kadir, Mei Choo Ang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiang ChengInstitute of IR4.0, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.
Jun Kit ChawInstitute of IR4.0, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6839-0784
Kam Meng GohDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Tunku Abdul Rahman University College, Kampus Utama, Jalan Genting Kelang, Kuala Lumpur 53300, Malaysia.
Tin Tin TingFaculty of Data Science and Information Technology, INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
Shafrida SahraniInstitute of IR4.0, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-4634-8021
Mohammad Nazir AhmadInstitute of IR4.0, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3639-1157
Rabiah Abdul KadirInstitute of IR4.0, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mei Choo AngInstitute of IR4.0, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5316-3936

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread adoption of cyber-physical systems and other cutting-edge digital technology in manufacturing industry production facilities may motivate stakeholders to embrace the idea of Industry 4.0. Some industrial companies already have different sensors installed on their machines; however, without proper analysis, the data collected is not useful. This systematic review's main goal is to synthesize the existing evidence on the application of predictive maintenance (PdM) with visual aids and to identify the key knowledge gaps in areas including utilities, power generation, industry, and energy consumption. After a thorough search and evaluation for relevancy, 37 documents were identified. Moreover, we identified the visual analytics of PdM, including anomaly detection, planning/scheduling, exploratory data analysis (EDA), and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). The findings revealed that anomaly detection was a major domain in PdM-related works. We conclude that most of the literature lacks depth in terms of an overall framework that combines data-driven and knowledge-driven techniques of PdM in the manufacturing industry. Some works that utilized both techniques indicated promising results, but there is insufficient research on involving maintenance personnel's feedback in the latter stage of PdM architecture. Thus, there are still pertinent issues that need to be investigated, and limitations that need to be overcome before PdM is deployed with minimal human involvement.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePublicationsHumansManufacturing Industrydeep learningexplainable artificial intelligenceindustry 4.0machine learningpredictive maintenance (PdM)visual analytics

Identifiers

PMID36080780
PMCPMC9460830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.