Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36080764›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Assessing Molecular Docking Tools to Guide the Design of Polymeric Materials Formulations: A Case Study of Canola and Soybean Protein.

Frage Abookleesh, Farag E S Mosa, Khaled Barakat, Aman Ullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review of protein structure-based analyses that illuminate plant stress mechanisms.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Multi-target Phenylpropanoids Against Epilepsy.Current neuropharmacology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frage AbookleeshDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada.
Farag E S MosaFaculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5, Canada.
Khaled BarakatFaculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3567-7279
Aman UllahDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1801-0162

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After more than 40 years of biopolymer development, the current research is still based on conventional laboratory techniques, which require a large number of experiments. Therefore, finding new research methods are required to accelerate and power the future of biopolymeric development. In this study, promising biopolymer-additive ranking was described using an integrated computer-aided molecular design platform. In this perspective, a set of 21 different additives with plant canola and soy proteins were initially examined by predicting the molecular interactions scores and mode of molecule interactions within the binding site using AutoDock Vina, Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), and Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area (MM-GBSA). The findings of the investigated additives highlighted differences in their binding energy, binding sites, pockets, types, and distance of bonds formed that play crucial roles in protein-additive interactions. Therefore, the molecular docking approach can be used to rank the optimal additive among a set of candidates by predicting their binding affinities. Furthermore, specific molecular-level insights behind protein-additives interactions were provided to explain the ranking results. The highlighted results can provide a set of guidelines for the design of high-performance polymeric materials at the molecular level. As a result, we suggest that the implementation of molecular modeling can serve as a fast and straightforward tool in protein-based bioplastics design, where the correct ranking of additives among sets of candidates is often emphasized. Moreover, these approaches may open new ways for the discovery of new additives and serve as a starting point for more in-depth investigations into this area.

Indexed as

AutoDock Vinabinding energybiopolymerblendingcross-linkersMM-GBSAmolecular dockingplant proteinplasticizers

Identifiers

PMID36080764
PMCPMC9460131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.