ArticlePolymers2022
Prediction of Bending Properties for 3D-Printed Carbon Fibre/Epoxy Composites with Several Processing Parameters Using ANN and Statistical Methods.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Artificial Neural Network Modeling of Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Polyamide 12 and Its Fiber-Reinforced Composites.Polymers · 2025Article
- Selection of Network Parameters in Direct ANN Modeling of Roughness Obtained in FFF Processes.Polymers · 2025Article
- Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing Parameter Optimization for Salmon Gelatin Gels Using Artificial Neural Networks and Response Surface Methodology: Influence on Physicochemical and Digestibility Properties.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effects of processing parameters on conventional molding techniques are well-known. However, the fabrication of a carbon fibre (CF)/epoxy composite via additive manufacturing (AM) is in the early development stages relative to fabrications based on resin infusion. Accordingly, we introduce predictions of the flexural strength, modulus, and strain for high-performance 3D printable CF/epoxy composites. The data prediction is analyzed using approaches based on an artificial neural network, analysis of variance, and a response surface methodology. The predicted results present high reliability and low error level, getting closer to experimental results. Different input data can be included in the system with the trained neural network, allowing for the prediction of different output parameters. The following factors that influence the AM composite processing were considered: vacuum pressure, printing speed, curing temperature, printing space, and thickness. We further demonstrate fast and streamlined fabrications of various composite materials with tailor-made properties, as the influence of each processing parameter on the desirable properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.